Ask HN: Talked about my fave cereals now I see ads for the exact cereals. How?
I was talking to my family meme bees about my top five cereals. (Reese’s puffs, Cap’n Crunch etc) I open up Twitter about an hour later and I see ads for those two exact cereals. I never searched for anything but even if I did and don’t remember my search engine is ddg.
There was a tlc Roku tv (which I’m connected to for remote control) and my iPhone, that’s it.
How the hell did I get these ads? I’ve never got a cereal ad before.
51 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 127 ms ] threadWhat led you to the discussion of cereals in the first place?
That’s a good question. Boredom led to the convo, I wasn’t using my phone at the time but even if I was “googling”, I would’ve been using duck duck go.
Generally IME we would get other devices associated to that user. e.g. If Sam bought something on his cell phone, when we aggregated that data or purchased it from others, we could associate Sam's other devices (computer, tablet etc). Typically we would only target this consumer based upon their marketing id across devices, and not target associated devices which didn't match to the user. However, there are some aggregators that do track devices commonly seen with the user, regardless of a known marketing id.
So not impossible you could have been targeted this way.
> Confirmation bias
> Coincidence
> You left other traces on the internet (searches, whatever) which fit into a pattern of people liking specific cereals
Given that I feel that Apple, Amazon and Google all have deals with a number of key marketing companies where they sell your marketing id based on keywords their devices "hear". So they aren't sharing your conversation with third parties but selling your marketing id based upon what they hear, e.g. you start talking about diapers and they'll sell your marketing id tagging diapers. I have done tests with this in creative ways with a few people and we've been able to trigger ads within a very short time period for things that in no way should be showing up and that none of us ever searched for or typed into the computer/device.
I'm all for someone proving me wrong or giving a better explanation but knowing how we dealt with peoples electronic data and what we had available to us I can't imagine they aren't doing this given what we have seen.
To be clear , you’re suggesting that there’s a map of labels (diapers, cereal etc) to marketing ids so apple can still say they anonymize your data even though for all intent and purposes, they don’t?
It lets them say they never sell your data, but they do sell meta-data about you. Probably a little over simplified but you get the idea.
You don't need to identify the customer.
I did some work with an online supermarket some time ago and I found some interesting associations worth trying like Sliced Brioche Bread + Nutella :-)
Sadly I didn't find any association like 'beer and diapers' ;-)
This is not entirely correct the way I understand it. While they're listening as in, the mic is active, the full text processing is not happening until the trigger word. There's a reason Siri is called Siri (distinctive pattern, easy to pick up before applying a stricter check). The issue with the recording was that the device thought it heard the trigger word and the mismatched sample was still uploaded.
What I don't believe is happening is actual background conversation processing by the assistants on purpose. (There are going to be tech slipups) Simply because the moment that's revealed, they'll get a regulatory ban hammer they really do not want. It would also chew through either your data or battery and be easy to notice.
I don't put that much faith in TVs though for example...
Your feelings notwithstanding, there is zero evidence of this that I've seen.
The former is probably slightly more likely.
Then less than an hour later I had an ad on my phone for ferrero rocher candy. It was incredibly creepy.
I know supposedly the Google phone and Google home (in my case a model from Lenovo) doesn't parse your conversation for ads, but I have no other explanation.
Also see @davismwfl answer on this thread.
You hadn't seen it yet, but lo and behold, you did later.
Y’all is the Southern second-person plural, a contraction of ‘you all’ (you, second-person; all, suggesting more than one)
all y'all by comparison is generally agreed to mean everyone in the group and can be a replacement for the phrase every last one of you
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13597225
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13628231
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15940240
No less creepy, but can understand why you'd think that.
Works like a charm with Facebook and items with a high price tab (like high end phones) because the one who search for the phone advices with the end buyer.
I've never seen it for low price tag items. Probably there is an algorithm out there calculating the odds of becoming you a customer. Probably you are on the age target for that brand.
Do it many times with both spoken and written topics, and away from and near the devices, and I bet you'll seem similar frequency of hits afterward.
To be ultra paranoid i'd avoid even chatting about it digitally. ISP distrust.
Some people might say you started talking about cereal because you were blasted with commercials about cereal you just didn't remember until that conversation framed you to remember them.
But we know better.
The same can be true with advertisements.
In the last week this has happened to me twice: once, in a YouTube video being posted by someone that directly related to a conversation I had yet to have and a free flashlight offer appearing in an advertisement on the day I lost power from ice storms. Both were more likely coincidences than anything else.
Apparently it's known as ultrasonic malware and is a type of side-channel attack to leak information to/from devices. So high-frequency audio is transmitted to devices that are listening and can even respond.
The scary thing is that researchers have already found this type of software embedded into [2] many applications.
Now this isn't the same as listening to "human conversations", but it's not hard to believe that some apps are waiting for any audio and just sending it to servers somewhere...
What apps do you have installed on your phone? Any games? Apparently [3] some games listen to you, even in the background...
[1] https://intellisec.de/pubs/2016-batmobile.pdf
[2] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/234-android-a...
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/business/media/alphonso-a...
__________ = The frequency range would probably have to be pet-safe, since dogs and cats can hear way higher frequencies that we can't.
I was talking to a friend of mines who recently had gotten into trading on robinhood and he was just explaining his investing strategy, as it were, to me as we walked through a park we frequent. I had my iphone on me as usual. Anways later that evening I would get one of these spam follow requests on instagram from some investing related personality account; keep in my mind I have essentially never searched for investing/market related info or content ever on my machine and definitely not on instagram, most of whom I follow are celebrities or artists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases#Frequ...