HN Explorer

3 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 17.1 ms ] thread
rucciva
An attempt to replace our awkward use of null_resource + remote provisioner combination.
multifascia
Any particular reason you did not organize/name your resource files in the same style as most of the Hashicorp maintained providers?

Also have you seen the `validation` helper package? Has some great ways to catch user input errors at plan time

rucciva
Did you mean prefixing filename with resource_ or datasource_ ?. Well i just like to keeps related things close to each other, but at the same time prefer smaller files.

Just seen it now, maybe will use them in the next iteration.

Thanks for the comment btw, this is my first post here.