The same could be said for this comment. His article is full of concrete reasons why you might not want to buy an M1 right now. Would you care to address even a single one?
The article is full of concrete reasons not to buy an M1 if you use Microsoft and Adobe software.
I suspect the number of Edge users in the Mac ecosystem is not high. Acrobat might be more of a problem, but it's still not quite the mainstream MacBook Air use case.
The question isn't so much "Do these apps work?" but "When will they work?" MS and Adobe will be distributing Apple Silicon builds within the year - most likely within six months, and possibly by early next year.
So these are showstopper problems if you need these applications on a Mac right now, but not so much if you're planning to wait and see a while.
Honestly, Catalina and Big Sur broke far more applications than the M1 move did. If you're doing the prudent thing and running a year or so behind it's very likely there will be fewer problems.
So ultimately there aren't many reasons beyond novelty and a percentage of natural replacement why most people who lean heavily on Office and Acrobat are going to need a Macbook Air right now.
Agreed. Looks like he was seeking out apps that don’t work on day one(could be os related or Rosetta related because a lot of Mac software isn’t fully ported to Big Sur yet)
Reviving the non touch screen argument, which is 100% subjective and basically written with vitriol towards the Apple marketing. Click bait hit piece.
Completely disagree. This is the first review I've seen that talks about performance of 'obscure' third party apps that might never see a native port. That's very valuable to some people.
It seems like a long road to native apps on the Mac. It's been hard enough just to get plug-in vendors and everyone else to go to 64-bit. Now a whole new architecture?
But this is ridiculous: "What I’ve never comprehended is why Apple supports touch displays on iPhones, Watch, and iPad, but not on the MacBook."
Because touchscreens on computers are STUPID. People use computers because they need PRECISION, and they don't want a dumbed-down UI with giant buttons taking up the whole screen so you can poke at them with your fat fingers... while blocking your view of the UI with your hand.
The computer has a trackpad and keyboard. USE THEM.
How’s it marketed as a gen 10 device? They didn’t remove the higher tiered macs still running intel in the pros. The airs they blow past their previous versions. MacBook has been the same since power pc. Also has the same non first party issues as the previous on it day zero devices. This is not new for legacy Apple users.
“ I don’t think it can keep, made claims it doesn’t explain during announcements, and that the Apple-chosen reviewers didn’t find the warts I found in the first two hours of review.”
A good reminder of how everyone has an agenda when they are writing.
A good early M1 user experience will be had by those entirely in the apple software ecosystem.
If you are venturing out of the ecosystem, use a good Remote Desktop application and a powerful plugged in computer to get the best of both worlds.
"Apple-chosen press" is referenced in almost every paragraph of this article if you are wondering what the author's intent is here.
I'll sum up his unique complaints... Lots of old Microsoft specific software still doesn't work well at the moment. If you are an enthusiastic Edge browser user, this laptop probably isn't for you.
It should hardly come as a surprise to anyone with just a little technical knowledge, that when you switch to a completely new system architecture, 3rd party apps do not all work perfectly from day one.
Apple did not promise anything wrt. 3rd party apps, so talking about “broken promise” is downright dishonest. But that’s just the usual from the Forbes Contributor Network and Clown Car Testing Facility.
And it's sad because Apple has actually provided a very robust translation layer in Rosetta 2
Every single day we hear of at least one well known app adding support for M1 Macs. It's all a matter of time. I'd wager we'd have a robust ecosystem of apps once the Pro Macs launch (higher end 13" and the 16")
> Apple did not promise anything wrt. 3rd party apps
Of course they did: "With the introduction of Rosetta 2, M1 and macOS Big Sur seamlessly run apps that haven't yet transitioned to Universal versions. So without updating, you can keep working on Fusion360 projects or reach the next level in your favorite game."
Rosetta 2 (and Rosetta before it) may be an amazing technical accomplishment, but it's entirely fair for a reviewer to say it doesn't cut it for him. As funny as some of his choices are (Edge on a Mac, on purpose?), he's not reaching; this is what he uses everyday. It's also fair to point out that if your favorite game doesn't happen to be Rise of the Tomb Raider, your mileage may vary.
I think the reviewer is a little unfair in his emphasis on "Apple-chosen" reviewers, but this frankly is the kind of thing I look for. Five-star reviews are rarely as useful to me as three-star reviews.
1) keep expectations low in terms of compatibility. Most non apple apps will take time before they are ported to run natively on M1
2) related to point 1, the great battery life being marketed is not applicable if your apps arsenal is not native yet.
These two might sound trivial to some but i did not think of them initially. I was ready to get the M1 if there’s a good deal next weeks. But now i’m not sure.
I personally have not experienced any issues and the M1 is a marvel. Also, the return window is through January. I sure as hell am not going to return mine.
To point 1- some native Mac apps are not Big Sur compatible yet. It could be 2 separate issues. I held off from upgrading to Big Sur on my audio/daw iMac Pro for this reason.
2- claim seems slightly dubious as it depends on the app. Some translated software is more cpu intensive than others. So maybe? Just like the native stuff will be.
If you're doing audio production you should never upgrade MacOS immediately. I get almost as many emails from developers telling me not to as I get notifications from Apple telling me to upgrade.
This has been true for at least the last 15 years, MacOS upgrades always screw something up. Usually iLok
absolutely- and I never do. Was mostly stating that there are legitimate reasons to not upgrade and that some software doesnt work with the latest OS that isnt necessarily related to M1.
In my 19 years of using Macs, I’ve never even heard of WinZip for Mac. Sure, I’ve used 3rd party compression tools for formats like 7Zip or bz2, but why you’d want to run WinZip on macOS today is beyond me.
I was also under the impression from apple’s announcements that Rosetta 2 had much higher compatibility and stability. I absolutely can’t have critical applications like Skype or office crash on me.
| Want assured software compatibility and performance
How has the experience been for software developers across the board? Would love to hear personal accounts since all I'm finding is very generic articles like this one (talking about fan speed, performance charts, etc. but nothing specific targeting specialist areas)
Docker and Android emulators aren’t currently working, which is probably the biggest thing keeping me from buying. I don’t expect them to be broken for too long.
x86 windows virtualisation is probably going to be the biggest issue for most people, and I don’t see working (maybe wine + qemu, but not full os).
> New chipset with new architecture means old apps won't run or will be slow
Wow, you don't say. I been watching a few review videos[0] (not sure if they're from the "Apple-Choosen Press") and the results are absolutely astonishing.
But the thing is, this shouldn't be surprising. This is the final form of the Apple Ethos of full vertical integration, from OS all the way down to (now) the frikking processor.
I think they're afraid, and I don't care if my new Apple M1 Macbook doesn't run Office well, it's Logic/FinalCut/etc. that matters to me and most people.
I am personally not buying MackBook for other reasons (I want to be master of my own machine and I am willing to pay costs of maintaining Linux on it, I hate shallow keyboard and no function keys).
The only reason against M1 itself I can think of is the tight grip Apple is going to have over entire stack (including memory). They will be creating all possible configurations and you are going to have to pay whatever premium Apple thinks they are able to impose on you which, extrapolating from the past, is going to be hefty.
But,
I think M1 is amazing piece of technology and would switch in no time if not for other reasons.
I also think competition is going to take a hint and we can expect more of this in the future.
This review is hilariously bad and biased ("no touchscreen or 5G!"), but the app compatibility is an expected chicken-or-egg issue with early adopters. The point I would make is you have to weigh the app experience in Nov 2020 against your expected experience for the rest of the life of the machine. I know people who've kept Macs running for nearly a decade (e.g. 2011 Macbook Air) and I'd strongly suspect 5 years from now a 2020 M1 Mac will be a lot more futureproof and app-compatible than a 2020 Intel Mac.
If your main concern is running Zoom and OneNote for the next 6 months, maybe sit out M1 for now.
Apple shows no signs towards being interested in selling a touch screen laptop. They steer people to their iPads for that and have indicated otherwise for their laptops. Rightly or wrongly.
After 12 years on Macs I picked up a touchscreen PC and would simply never go back to a non-touch machine, it is not essential, but it is incredibly convenient. Why shouldn't it be possible to touch rather than tap when appropriate? After a few months selecting an appropriate option for any particular input is totally natural and subconscious. I have no idea why noting the lack of touch on a Mac should be considered "biased".
I picked up a Dell touchscreen laptop and literally have never used the touchscreen. I even forgot it has it. I just can’t see any reason to use it and how it’s better.
I probably use it for around 10-15% of navigation and scrolling on web sites. It's not a case of "I'm on a web site designed for a touch device, I will therefore now start poking the screen", but more along the lines of noticing it'd be much quicker to work a sequence of buttons by touch than by tap.
Touch is definitely much faster to get through certain styles of forms. The first that came to mind where I'd often tend to touch is the TFL (Transport for London) journey planner.
As it happens, tabbing around a badly designed form often doesn't work correctly. Then there are UI with hundreds of focusable inputs where while tabbing might work correctly, is extremely cumbersome and slow to use.
This is not to suggest replacing a keyboard with a touchscreen, any more than suggest a keyboard is no longer required since a mouse or trackpad is available. It's just an additional form of input, and one I'd personally definitely miss.
I agree with you. The keyboard/mouse has been a standard input combination for PCs since the 80s. Maybe it's time we added touch to the standard. Seems some additional input methods are likely well past due.
My work provided laptop has a touch screen. I only ever use it when I'm trying to point out something on the screen and touch the screen by accident. It's always jarring.
He also said “they’ve lost their way if they ever give you a stylus” and then Apple Pencil. But I do agree and even like the Apple Pencil. I wish they saw themselves a little more like a “batteries included” company trying to deck out their stuff with features people may never use than now. But I also think that’s always been a criticism of Apple.
I will add this though. You can side car a tablet to your Big Sur Mac. Pretty sure it stays touchable through to the Mac client.
The stylus comment was more of a quib on clunky resistive touchscreen which forced phones to come with a stylus rather than the idea of drawing with a stylus being bad.
Pointing out that the laptop is missing features many peot want, is not "bad biased". It's especially silly to make this accusation moments before you yourself say "maybe sit this one out".
Macs cost a lot and promise long life. That's a long time to not have a feature with increasing desirability.
M1 enables merging MacOS with iOS. A touchscreen is an important aspect of that merge.
> I know people who've kept Macs running for nearly a decade (e.g. 2011 Macbook Air)
It’s no longer my primary machine but my 2009 MBP is still running just fine (new memory and disk 5 years back, battery is a bit shagged at this stage) and I use it all the time for storing and casting media, light dev work, office apps etc.
Something you'll not be able to do with Apple Silicon hardware. I am interested in the longevity of the new devices, but they'll definitely age faster since the configuration you get today is it.
That's been the case since 2016, after that everything is soldered in, so you can't change anything.
And even before that in the 2012 iteration you could only change the SSD with the RAM still being soldered in.
So all in all - it's been almost 10 years since they've been aging faster.
This is sort of like complaining about the passenger capacity of a 911 or the cornering on a minivan. You expect a review to describe how good something is at being what it intends to be, not how the reviewer prefers an entirely different style.
People can wish for things within creations that the creators never imagined or considered inappropriate. Which is why mod-ability is a nice escape hatch. Sadly Apple has rarely supported or encouraged that in their hardware.
I actually found review to be a nice counterpoint to mostly glowing reviews by reviewers like Dave2D and Marques Brownlee
.
> If your main concern is running Zoom and OneNote for the next 6 months, maybe sit out M1 for now.
There is very little information out there about how M1 fits into developer workflow. It is not just Zoom and OneNote but app compatibility is very important for developers and I think most developers(except iOS devs) would perhaps want to sit out the release. There is no docker. VirtualBox will probably never work on Apple M1, so an escape to Linux VM is not available if you need. Parallels and Vmware Fusion may work someday but you will end up paying for those and someone should do performance/battery comparison if I am going to run a VM all day. Things like Emacs don't work yet and only information available about this is from obscure twitter threads.
A few Pro features Apple could add to the MacBook Pro:
ECC, ZFS, function keys
Yeah, function keys like on the Air. I don't know anyone who likes the Touch Bar.
I'd like to get a Pro but the Air is very very good and I don't find anything that I really value on the Pro. Yes, the Pro is faster than the Air but the Air is fast and faster apparently requires a fan.
The pro is not any faster, it just has a fan that kicks in that prevents the machine from throttling as quickly. Someone who buys a PC with a water cooler isn't buying a machine that's faster than someone buying one with an air cooler. I realize there's a nuance here.
From the reviews on YouTube that I’ve seen, the fan on the Pro is inaudible all the time, even after running Cinebench in a loop for 30 mins. The reviewer was able to conclude that the fan was actually doing something, since the benchmark score held steady over those multiple consecutive runs whereas the score of the Air dropped after about ten minutes of sustained load.
I’m sure the Pro has the same throttling logic as the Air since they’re identical apart from the fan and case/peripherals but it’s going to be very difficult to get it to throttle. I would think you’d need to run a microbenchmark of vector instructions in a very tight loop just to get the fan to spin fast enough to be audible. Under normal use it may never happen unless the fan fails.
Not going to happen. It almost happened around 2007, when Sun's Jonathan Schwartz announced it on his blog. Then Apple conceded the development, sticked with HFS+ for another decade, only to eventually roll out APFS.
This is a review from someone who uses Microsoft Edge, Outlook, and Adobe Reader on a Mac. Those are very unusual choices nowadays for Mac software, so I don't think this applies to most Mac users considering upgrading.
I think I finally convinced my wife to stop using Acrobat Reader for Mac, which performs and looks like a java swing app. I don't know why she refused to use Preview for viewing PDFs, but I think some people just get set in their ways. That said, these people should not be writing technical reviews for major news organizations.
I had to use Acrobat Reader on a Mac to work with a book publisher because the comments they were attaching to the manuscript didn't work the same on Apple Preview. PDFs don't behave exactly the same everywhere for things that goes beyond just reading documents. For example, I had a reply on the PDF that was visible on Preview but vanished when you tried to read on Acrobat Reader, that caused a lot of trouble with the publisher that claimed I didn't answer... YMMV with regarding to these features and them working across apps.
Sure I think Outlook is fairly widely used in corp environments, though I’d be surprised to find many such environments who use outlook purchasing or supporting mac laptops for their users. There are cheaper and perfectly capable windows machines for office work.
So it is an unusual choice on an Apple laptop, but also I expect it to be supported in time, and it is unsurprising that it is not amongst the first apps ported to a new architecture.
Plenty of companies have a mix of Mac and Windows.
The last company I worked for had a mix of Windows & Mac devices, and everyone got the office suite on it (including Outlook).
Additionally, my current company is a small business that runs on Windows computers and the office suite, however I have installed Outlook on my personal Mac as a single licenced user can install it on 5 devices, and use it for answering work emails from home (I've also got it on my iPad and phone - it works great).
There are a lot of alternatives to the MS Outlook binary though in a mixed environment, as your use of iPad and iPhone shows, and most mac users will be using those as opposed to the actual outlook app. There is a web version (increasingly popular amongst corporate users), and mail.app supports outlook accounts as does the ios version of mail.app.
Perhaps some users prefer outlook.app on their mac, which is fine, and I'm sure it'll come with time, but it's hardly a deal breaker for most people who have chosen MacOS, and none of those alternatives require the outlook app itself from MS which is what this article is talking about.
> most mac users will be using those as opposed to the actual outlook app
I would assume most mac users will be using those as well as the actual outlook app. Mail.app can handle basic email, but do not cover Outlook's other capabilities (which include corporate address books and diary management).
The web version is good-enough for most people, but not for power users. Will it be a deal breaker? Probably for some users, but probably not for most, but it's not an uncommon application.
Mail.app and Calendar.app work fine with outlook accounts and Word and Excel work fine in Rosetta 2.
Edge is based on Chromium now, and nobody uses it on the Mac, so there's not much point in testing rendering on a Mac (better to test on Windows Edge).
However if you're really bought into the MS ecosystem (or much of your company is), and can't do without outlook or old Windows programs like winzip (!) I'd agree with the author that you should wait, though I don't agree that it's a big problem to do so or this is somehow a failing of the new Macs.
Pretty sure this isn't going to be a problem for longer than a few weeks anyway, as MS have already announced the office suite working fine on early betas of M1 and new beta builds for the architecture:
Microsoft applications are a massive staple in the business world. The fact that Microsoft went as far as to port them natively to the MacOS platform goes to show how important these applications are.
This device, and the non-Touch Bar "MacBook Escape" before it, succeed or fail based on what you think "Pro" means. John Gruber thinks when Apple says "Pro" they mean "deluxe" or "nicer". (See https://daringfireball.net/2015/11/the_ipad_pro for example.)
You can argue that this could have been avoided by calling this particular device the MacBook. But that might have made people think it was the default choice, where Apple probably expects you to start with the Air.
The single port MacBook is my favorite computer to date! It’s not for everyone, including you obviously, but I’m not sure what reputation would have to do with that. Just different computers with different purposes.
I guess a lot of it has to do with aspirational marketing. It's the same with DSLRs or sporty versions of cars. If you would benefit from more available peripherals and monitors, a bigger screen and more memory (pretty much most professional computer people I can think of would benefit from these) then this likely isn't the machine for you.
> does Parallels fall into the category of software that runs poorly on the new M1 chipset?
It does for most use cases where you want to run images meant for different CPU architectures, like amd64. It shouldn't if you want to run something meant for the same CPU architecture, which isn't going to be a thing for a long long time.
Qualcomm's payments IIRC are also dependent on the final device cost so I'd think that the payments can get absurdly expensive. I'm hoping that cellular modems might come to the Mac when Apple gets their in-house modems ready
That is my guess as well, but I haven't found any official word on this. It is ridiculous that I can buy a Dell with an LTE modem and not a MacBook Pro.
If Apple were to ship one it would be in a later release. Eg the iPad didn’t have one as Apple don’t like to reveal info about models which you have to do for FCC approval.
Lots of back-and-forth on specs and compatibility, yet somehow the complete lack of privacy outed last week has suddenly vanished from the discussion. There might be something to that "Apple-Chosen Reviewer" thing. Perhaps Apple's best technology is the one that mutes all their shifty acts.
> During Covid-19, I know many people using their LTE-infused notebooks so they don’t have to compete with their kids for bandwidth.
That's just bizarre and makes me question this reviewer's comprehension of technology. He doesn't understand hotspots? He things hes maxing out a home wifi+ISP connection but LTE can handle the load?
I think it’s not uncommon for 4G to be faster than home broadband for people outside major areas.
If you use 4G not only do they get a faster connection in the first place but they also avoid contending with other family users also on the slower broadband.
Doesn’t seem bizarre or technically ignorant to me?
115 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 182 ms ] threadI suspect the number of Edge users in the Mac ecosystem is not high. Acrobat might be more of a problem, but it's still not quite the mainstream MacBook Air use case.
The question isn't so much "Do these apps work?" but "When will they work?" MS and Adobe will be distributing Apple Silicon builds within the year - most likely within six months, and possibly by early next year.
So these are showstopper problems if you need these applications on a Mac right now, but not so much if you're planning to wait and see a while.
Honestly, Catalina and Big Sur broke far more applications than the M1 move did. If you're doing the prudent thing and running a year or so behind it's very likely there will be fewer problems.
So ultimately there aren't many reasons beyond novelty and a percentage of natural replacement why most people who lean heavily on Office and Acrobat are going to need a Macbook Air right now.
But this is ridiculous: "What I’ve never comprehended is why Apple supports touch displays on iPhones, Watch, and iPad, but not on the MacBook."
Because touchscreens on computers are STUPID. People use computers because they need PRECISION, and they don't want a dumbed-down UI with giant buttons taking up the whole screen so you can poke at them with your fat fingers... while blocking your view of the UI with your hand.
The computer has a trackpad and keyboard. USE THEM.
So dumb.
A good reminder of how everyone has an agenda when they are writing.
A good early M1 user experience will be had by those entirely in the apple software ecosystem.
If you are venturing out of the ecosystem, use a good Remote Desktop application and a powerful plugged in computer to get the best of both worlds.
I'll sum up his unique complaints... Lots of old Microsoft specific software still doesn't work well at the moment. If you are an enthusiastic Edge browser user, this laptop probably isn't for you.
Firefox is extremely buggy right now, even if it claims to be Universal (where art thou Rust tooling?), so perhaps the wait-and-see approach is right.
On the MacBook Air I have here (8 GB RAM / 512 GB SSD), it’s quite clear that Apple is onto something here.
Apple did not promise anything wrt. 3rd party apps, so talking about “broken promise” is downright dishonest. But that’s just the usual from the Forbes Contributor Network and Clown Car Testing Facility.
Every single day we hear of at least one well known app adding support for M1 Macs. It's all a matter of time. I'd wager we'd have a robust ecosystem of apps once the Pro Macs launch (higher end 13" and the 16")
Of course they did: "With the introduction of Rosetta 2, M1 and macOS Big Sur seamlessly run apps that haven't yet transitioned to Universal versions. So without updating, you can keep working on Fusion360 projects or reach the next level in your favorite game."
Rosetta 2 (and Rosetta before it) may be an amazing technical accomplishment, but it's entirely fair for a reviewer to say it doesn't cut it for him. As funny as some of his choices are (Edge on a Mac, on purpose?), he's not reaching; this is what he uses everyday. It's also fair to point out that if your favorite game doesn't happen to be Rise of the Tomb Raider, your mileage may vary.
I think the reviewer is a little unfair in his emphasis on "Apple-chosen" reviewers, but this frankly is the kind of thing I look for. Five-star reviews are rarely as useful to me as three-star reviews.
1) keep expectations low in terms of compatibility. Most non apple apps will take time before they are ported to run natively on M1
2) related to point 1, the great battery life being marketed is not applicable if your apps arsenal is not native yet.
These two might sound trivial to some but i did not think of them initially. I was ready to get the M1 if there’s a good deal next weeks. But now i’m not sure.
What are your thoughts?
https://isapplesiliconready.com/
I personally have not experienced any issues and the M1 is a marvel. Also, the return window is through January. I sure as hell am not going to return mine.
2- claim seems slightly dubious as it depends on the app. Some translated software is more cpu intensive than others. So maybe? Just like the native stuff will be.
This has been true for at least the last 15 years, MacOS upgrades always screw something up. Usually iLok
How has the experience been for software developers across the board? Would love to hear personal accounts since all I'm finding is very generic articles like this one (talking about fan speed, performance charts, etc. but nothing specific targeting specialist areas)
x86 windows virtualisation is probably going to be the biggest issue for most people, and I don’t see working (maybe wine + qemu, but not full os).
> New chipset with new architecture means old apps won't run or will be slow
Wow, you don't say. I been watching a few review videos[0] (not sure if they're from the "Apple-Choosen Press") and the results are absolutely astonishing.
But the thing is, this shouldn't be surprising. This is the final form of the Apple Ethos of full vertical integration, from OS all the way down to (now) the frikking processor.
I think they're afraid, and I don't care if my new Apple M1 Macbook doesn't run Office well, it's Logic/FinalCut/etc. that matters to me and most people.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXgLBa5jgr8
The only reason against M1 itself I can think of is the tight grip Apple is going to have over entire stack (including memory). They will be creating all possible configurations and you are going to have to pay whatever premium Apple thinks they are able to impose on you which, extrapolating from the past, is going to be hefty.
But,
I think M1 is amazing piece of technology and would switch in no time if not for other reasons.
I also think competition is going to take a hint and we can expect more of this in the future.
If your main concern is running Zoom and OneNote for the next 6 months, maybe sit out M1 for now.
After 12 years on Macs I picked up a touchscreen PC and would simply never go back to a non-touch machine, it is not essential, but it is incredibly convenient. Why shouldn't it be possible to touch rather than tap when appropriate? After a few months selecting an appropriate option for any particular input is totally natural and subconscious. I have no idea why noting the lack of touch on a Mac should be considered "biased".
Touch is definitely much faster to get through certain styles of forms. The first that came to mind where I'd often tend to touch is the TFL (Transport for London) journey planner.
This is not to suggest replacing a keyboard with a touchscreen, any more than suggest a keyboard is no longer required since a mouse or trackpad is available. It's just an additional form of input, and one I'd personally definitely miss.
I will add this though. You can side car a tablet to your Big Sur Mac. Pretty sure it stays touchable through to the Mac client.
Macs cost a lot and promise long life. That's a long time to not have a feature with increasing desirability. M1 enables merging MacOS with iOS. A touchscreen is an important aspect of that merge.
It’s no longer my primary machine but my 2009 MBP is still running just fine (new memory and disk 5 years back, battery is a bit shagged at this stage) and I use it all the time for storing and casting media, light dev work, office apps etc.
Something you'll not be able to do with Apple Silicon hardware. I am interested in the longevity of the new devices, but they'll definitely age faster since the configuration you get today is it.
So all in all - it's been almost 10 years since they've been aging faster.
This is a huge plus in my opinion.
Those are features of other laptops. And Apple already ships the technogy to support both.
>The point I would make is you have to weigh the app experience in Nov 2020 against your expected experience for the rest of the life of the machine.
So much for the "It just works" marketing that Apple used to push a couple of years ago.
> If your main concern is running Zoom and OneNote for the next 6 months, maybe sit out M1 for now.
There is very little information out there about how M1 fits into developer workflow. It is not just Zoom and OneNote but app compatibility is very important for developers and I think most developers(except iOS devs) would perhaps want to sit out the release. There is no docker. VirtualBox will probably never work on Apple M1, so an escape to Linux VM is not available if you need. Parallels and Vmware Fusion may work someday but you will end up paying for those and someone should do performance/battery comparison if I am going to run a VM all day. Things like Emacs don't work yet and only information available about this is from obscure twitter threads.
I'd like to get a Pro but the Air is very very good and I don't find anything that I really value on the Pro. Yes, the Pro is faster than the Air but the Air is fast and faster apparently requires a fan.
No, it means not going slower. You don't go faster by not going slower.
I’m sure the Pro has the same throttling logic as the Air since they’re identical apart from the fan and case/peripherals but it’s going to be very difficult to get it to throttle. I would think you’d need to run a microbenchmark of vector instructions in a very tight loop just to get the fan to spin fast enough to be audible. Under normal use it may never happen unless the fan fails.
Not going to happen. It almost happened around 2007, when Sun's Jonathan Schwartz announced it on his blog. Then Apple conceded the development, sticked with HFS+ for another decade, only to eventually roll out APFS.
I'd probably pay 200 euro extra for a "real pro" edition that changes nothing else except remove the dumb bar.
Come on Apple, take my money. I cannot be the only one who wants this.
(I guess I could just disable the bar in software though, but where's my esc key then...)
Adobe reader and edge... I agree have better alternatives that come shipped with Mac.
So it is an unusual choice on an Apple laptop, but also I expect it to be supported in time, and it is unsurprising that it is not amongst the first apps ported to a new architecture.
The last company I worked for had a mix of Windows & Mac devices, and everyone got the office suite on it (including Outlook).
Additionally, my current company is a small business that runs on Windows computers and the office suite, however I have installed Outlook on my personal Mac as a single licenced user can install it on 5 devices, and use it for answering work emails from home (I've also got it on my iPad and phone - it works great).
Perhaps some users prefer outlook.app on their mac, which is fine, and I'm sure it'll come with time, but it's hardly a deal breaker for most people who have chosen MacOS, and none of those alternatives require the outlook app itself from MS which is what this article is talking about.
I would assume most mac users will be using those as well as the actual outlook app. Mail.app can handle basic email, but do not cover Outlook's other capabilities (which include corporate address books and diary management).
The web version is good-enough for most people, but not for power users. Will it be a deal breaker? Probably for some users, but probably not for most, but it's not an uncommon application.
What if your company's email and calendar server is Outlook? And what if everybody's writing docunents with Word and sheets with Excel?
Furthermore a web developer probably wants to test in Edge even if I assume Chrome is enough.
Edge is based on Chromium now, and nobody uses it on the Mac, so there's not much point in testing rendering on a Mac (better to test on Windows Edge).
However if you're really bought into the MS ecosystem (or much of your company is), and can't do without outlook or old Windows programs like winzip (!) I'd agree with the author that you should wait, though I don't agree that it's a big problem to do so or this is somehow a failing of the new Macs.
Pretty sure this isn't going to be a problem for longer than a few weeks anyway, as MS have already announced the office suite working fine on early betas of M1 and new beta builds for the architecture:
https://www.macworld.co.uk/news/microsoft-office-big-sur-m1-...
In fact on checking I see the betas have already arrived:
https://twitter.com/Schwieb/status/1326728712948076545
You can argue that this could have been avoided by calling this particular device the MacBook. But that might have made people think it was the default choice, where Apple probably expects you to start with the Air.
Naming is hard.
Now they are stuck with a 13" pro that stopped being Pro.
Maybe this question would be better phrased, does Parallels fall into the category of software that runs poorly on the new M1 chipset?
It does for most use cases where you want to run images meant for different CPU architectures, like amd64. It shouldn't if you want to run something meant for the same CPU architecture, which isn't going to be a thing for a long long time.
Why not? If you consider there are 3 main desktop OSes, these are Windows, macOS, and Linux. MacOS and Linux already work on ARM64.
For Windows software, CrossOver for Mac runs on M1.
App crashes were not reported elsewhere. Aside from some subjective commentary, there's a genuinely different side shown in the review.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/m1-macbook-closed-lid-d...
That's just bizarre and makes me question this reviewer's comprehension of technology. He doesn't understand hotspots? He things hes maxing out a home wifi+ISP connection but LTE can handle the load?
If you use 4G not only do they get a faster connection in the first place but they also avoid contending with other family users also on the slower broadband.
Doesn’t seem bizarre or technically ignorant to me?