6 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 31.1 ms ] thread
How is this a "Wikileaks killer" then? The essence of Wikileaks is in how they protect their sources.
That's the point of the article.
Exactly I've seen everywhere it is a Wikileaks article, yet clearly it is prohibited from being so by the T.O.S.
Then why call it a "Wikileaks killer" in the title of the article?
The intent seems to be a misguided attempt to do as much.
More like whistleblowerleaks. Sounds like a honeypot for the unwary whistleblower.