[–] natrik 5y ago ↗ https://web.archive.org/web/20201126223119/https://www.jhune...https://twitter.com/JHUNewsLetter/status/1332100136152035330... [–] ratsmack 5y ago ↗ The John Hopkins powers that be have yet to publish what "inaccuracies" there were that required the take down. I suspect that they got "the call" from someone that is connected to their line of funding.
[–] ratsmack 5y ago ↗ The John Hopkins powers that be have yet to publish what "inaccuracies" there were that required the take down. I suspect that they got "the call" from someone that is connected to their line of funding.
[–] gnusty_gnurc 5y ago ↗ It's always disconcerting to see academic inquiry censored. [–] salamimonger 5y ago ↗ We must trust all the science except the science that would invalidate our science.
[–] salamimonger 5y ago ↗ We must trust all the science except the science that would invalidate our science.
[–] ovi256 5y ago ↗ You can see the webinar here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TKJN61aflIIt has much better quality for the graphs, allowing one to read the label values.
[–] ghastmaster 5y ago ↗ The article link now has a editor note with a link to the PDF of the original article with a redacted watermark.
7 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 26.8 ms ] threadhttps://twitter.com/JHUNewsLetter/status/1332100136152035330...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TKJN61aflI
It has much better quality for the graphs, allowing one to read the label values.