Ask HN: I have $1M cash in my bank. How can I stretch it so I can retire?

71 points by archeantus ↗ HN
I’ve worked hard in the tech industry for the last eight years and have saved up a nest egg. In addition to that I recently sold my house which means I literally have $1M in my bank account right now.

For so many on here that is not too much money, but for me and my bg, I feel more fortunate than I ever could have dreamed of being.

I like my job, but it’s stressful. My dream is to use this nest egg to make investments that will grow the capital and allow me to live off of it.

Am I jumping the gun? Is $1M not enough? I’m sure I could get way more money if I endure more years of my job, but I so want a break. What are the chances of taking $1M and investing so that I don’t have to work anymore?

155 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 203 ms ] thread
You have 1M and is not enough?
$1m is not enough to retire on by itself. I have a large family and our expenses are around $100k/yr.

I want to stretch the $1m as long and as far as I possibly can. Looking for tips/suggestions on how I might do that.

https://www.bogleheads.org/ - this is a pretty good resource. While this is more of the journey to get to the point where you can retire, it would probably make sense to follow some of the advice above from a longer-term perspective, as you are aware you cannot retire off of the amount you currently have. The key to stretching it is reducing your living expenses obviously, and after taking a break finding some form of income to supplement what you already have. Moving somewhere cheaper tends to be top of the list, and could go well hand-in-hand with the taking a break bit.
I would be curious to see a breakdown of 100k of expenses.
The 100k/yr would be the first thing to look at.
Without a paid off home, it'd be a stretch depending on age. If you're willing to move to a lower cost of living area, you can get a pretty nice home and land for about $200k, let's say $250k. That leaves $750k to live off of after that (or you're paying a mortgage and keeping the full amount). If you can keep your expenses under $50k, that's 15 years ignoring earnings on the money.
You can get nice homes in the mid-West for $100k. In smaller cities, with low crime and good schools.
As a guy in mid 20s I can drain that in couple mos.
People who spend this much money on their own leisure are repulsive.
People who judge how others spend their hard earned money are repulsive.
People who $verb how others $verb their $noun are $adjective.
A million dollars would save hundreds of lives if directed to the right people or causes. If you are spending that amount of money all on yourself and your comfort in a few months, you're a bad person. It's that simple.
Yes and I'm comfortable with that. What's leisure for you might be passion for me.

An average SpaceX rocket launch costs over $50m and I'm telling you, if I got $49m more I would launch one for fun, then die broke with a smile on my face and a rocket emoji I pre-etched on my grave.

https://reddit.com/r/financialindependence

$1m invested correctly will net you $40k/yr, before taxes, in perpetual income. So you’ll need more than $2.5m to live off at your expected annual expenses of $100k.

This is a handy rule of thumb. On average, you can pull 4% from a balanced portfolio and it should last in perpetuity. Again, on average, across a range of scenarios.

So $1M nets you $40k, before tax or around $33k after tax (assuming no-state tax state of residence).

That's $3k per month free and clear, which would be doable a single person in a LCOL area, even having to pony up for a high-deductible health insurance plan. You'd have almost nothing left at the end of the month, but that's the plan?

Edit: Good point below - most/all of the returns will be capital gains and the rate is 0% under $40k (which should be easy to keep below, since you'd be selling a percentage of initial investment + returns)

Since accruals and dividends will mostly be capital gains, and the 0% tax bracket for federal cap. gains goes up to 40k, the 40k will still be just under 40k after taxes (assuming no state).
This is the best advice here, by far.

If you don't want to live on $40K/year, another option to consider is getting a lower stress job at a lower salary, while withdrawing $40K/year.

Pay down all debt. Cut down on expenses. Sell most of your possessions. Invest in stocks/crypto. Take a few months rest without any digital obligations and reset your health. Good luck.
Go join wsb. Yolo on options and make it 5x.
When it comes to someone asking for life advice on HN, let's not play games.

WSB is a terrible idea for someone looking for financial security and next steps.

If OP is looking to retire as quickly as possible, this is a method that might work. It's just high risk.

This strategy is my only hope to retire early. At least OP is making so much money that he could retire in early even without investing. I'm also 8 years in and have less than a quarter of that (and I live frugally).

It depends on whether or not we are going into a depression or if the markets are going to keep climbing.

Mutual funds on average the last couple years have returns of 13-14%, if that keeps up You could probably grow you million and draw enough to live off.

If the world goes into a depression, cash will be king, deflation will kick in and prices will drop. So your million will go a lot further.

If things cool off a bit and go back to a historical marketplace of 6% to 8% ROI, I think You have a way to go yet if You really want to not work at all. Of course if You are planning on checking out in the next 20 years You probably have enough.

It is a neat feeling when You see all that money in the bank though isn't it?

Without listing your expenses, location and cost-of-living, there's not much advice to give.

I do recommend immediately investing that money though. Sitting in a bank account does nothing for you.

go to a low cost country. that money is plenty in parts of asia, middle east etc.
Not really... Many of these countries have burgeoning middle classes with massive growth. The effects of globalization make it that you can buy million dollar apartments in any emerging market city. Also, I'd argue this in favor of asia, but I don't know anywhere in Middle east that's "cheap"
Turkey. An experienced senior engineer earns about 2000$. About what you would make if you invest your money using 4% withdrawal rate.

You can live in a coastal/touristy area and live well.

Having kids is the primary thing. With no kids, sure you can live however you want. I'd probably work through covid, given there's not a whole lot else to do right now. But certainly don't feel bad about taking a year or two off to do whatever (but do it on a budget--you want to err on the side of caution when starting out, and set that as your precedent), then see how you feel.

I spent three years variously traveling, working low-wage jobs, taking classes, spending about 10K/yr (which was less than what I was making on my investments). I'm back in software now and maybe a bit behind my peers who stayed in, but happy I did what I did.

I anticipate most people who "retire" in their 30's end up coming back to work at some point. Not for money necessarily, but because we find ourselves missing the feeling of being productive.

You need to set some parameters for us!

- How much per year do you want in your pocket? - Where do you want to live? (think climate, cost of living) - What will you do with your time? (take a year or two off, you may get bored) - How much will your retirement activities cost?

You get the idea.

Also consider part time remote work. If you're skilled I'm sure you can find a company that you can put in 10 hours per week at and it doesn't even have to be programming.

Could you share pointers for part time remote work? (Especially for software)
Freelance contracting is probably the easiest way to work part time. There is some stuff that is only x number of hours a week. This seems to mostly be sysadmin work or basic web design. The other option is to do something like 3-6 months on, then however long you want off, etc. Probably easiest for web and mobile developers.
> If you're skilled I'm sure you can find a company that you can put in 10 hours per week at

Do you have real world experience with that? I found on the contrary that the more skilled I get, the less companies are willing to make me work only part time. Which is too bad, because part time high paid job is really the best of both world.

Part time jobs in restaurants is what allowed me to learn programming when I was in early adult life, and I crave for as much time to learn new things, nowadays. Sadly, while people I work for are willing to negotiate insane amount of money (in my opinion), they are not to concede the slightest amount of time.

(comment deleted)
Split $750k between Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash and Ethereum.

Rent and pay 6-12 months in advance, try to get a discount.

Give yourself a 1 year budget and make it on the low end.

Everytime Bitcoin doubles take out 10% (Rake Method).

Wait one year and re-evaluate.

jfc no, I'm a big crypto fan but no.
No! Just for the counter party risk, let alone the value risk. And yes that includes managing your own keys. Especially that!
> I’ve worked hard in the tech industry for the last eight years...

> I like my job, but it’s stressful.

> Am I jumping the gun?

I think so. I'd work on reducing stress on the job. If there are specific causes, a decent manager should be able to help. If that doesn't work, try something else! If you've worked in tech for 8 years, you're pretty hireable, so there are lots of other opportunities. Part-time work is also an option.

It's also not the best time to retire like that. Interest rates are historically low, stock prices are nominally high, the way covid plays out is up in the air, and the impact of monetary and fiscal policy on the value of the dollar isn't clear.

This is probably the best advice.

$1M really isn't a lot to retire on especially if you're south of 35. You're best bet is to hire someone to give you professional advice on how to invest the money and keep working.

The last thing you want is to try and retire now, run out of cash and then have to try and get back into an incredibly fast moving industry where ageism is real. You run out of money in your 40's and its going to be hell on wheels trying and get back into the industry.

Compare that with reducing your stress, staying the course and continuing to add to what you have saved while growing the money you already have. Walking away when you're 100% sure you can run the clock out would be a wiser move than trying to do it now when you're young and borderline don't have enough in the bank to do it.

Patience is the better move at this point.

£1M is plenty if you're frugal. Not saying it's not an idea to try reducing stress and saving a little more but you'd have to be an idiot to accidentally burn through £1m before 50.
The critical piece of information thats missing is: how long are you stretching for? If you joined tech industry right out of college you are probably in your 30s, which means you need to make it stretch for 40+ years at least. Thats pretty hard.

On the other side if you moved to tech from somewhere else and you are actually older, the numbers start to become more reasonable.

You also said you recently sold a house, but what is your living situation now? What do you want it to be? Having $1M in the bank doesn't mean much if next year you need to turn around and buy another house for $1M

Figure out what number you can live on and compare that to the expected growth of your investment. If you have $1 million and you assume a 6% growth rate, you can live on 60k and not work. If you want less risk, assume a lower growth rate. If you want a higher standard of living, work until your nest egg provides a greater income through investment.
Don’t forget inflation and taxes.

Your 6% might only give you 48k after tax.

Subtract 2% for inflation and it’s only 28k per year you get to live off in perpetuity.

You're not going to be paying much (federal) taxes on that capgains income.
This is correct. In the US, currently if you are making no other income (AGI), your LTCG will be 0% for the first $40K. Bonds or other tax-inefficient (STCG generating) vehicles should be rebalanced into tax-deferred accounts (if the OP has been working in tech, unless they've been completely reckless, they should have a healthy 401k to work with) - it's very possible that an individual retiring on $1M and aiming for a SWR would pay $0 in federal income tax.
Warning: fellow engineer here. I am not a financial advisor.

You can follow one of two stock-based strategies:

1. Invest 100% in an S&P500 index fund, returning 8%/year [1] and growing to $11M in 30 years [2], minus withdrawals.

2. Invest 100% in bonds, or a high yield savings account, yielding 0.6%/year [3] and growing to $1.2M in 30 years [2], minus withdrawals.

You want to do as much of (1) as possible, while doing (2) as little as possible in order to pay for things (mortgage, rent, food, kids, etc.). You can't rely on (1) for day to day expenses, since stock returns are super variable (recessions, depressions are inevitable over time).

To balance the two, you can think of it as: consider retirement when MIN(1, 2) > expenses. The exact mix of 1 and 2 depends on your personal risk tolerance.

EDIT: Numbers for (2) were off, as suggested by multiple people in the comments. Updated.

---

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042415/what-average...

[2] Calculate this with an online interest calculator (being sure to re-invest earnings), or remember the rule of 7 (your stocks will double in value every seven years).

[3] https://www.bankrate.com/banking/savings/best-high-yield-int...

0.6% compounded for 30 years would be barely $1.02M
Yeah, that math was miles off, apparently based on 6% (way too high), not 0.6% p.a.
Looks like you dropped a zero in your calcs for example 2. Should be 1,000,000 * (1.006 ^ 30). Perhaps you used 1.06 instead. Works out to about $1.2m after 30 years, unadjusted for inflation.
> minus withdrawals

Withdrawals change these numbers tremendously

Right, they’re the crux of it. It comes down to what OP’s expenses are.
Give it all away and do it again
If it is not inflation hedged, you've no way of knowing if it will be enough. Holding fiat currency is exceptionally dangerous.

Diversity is good. You don't want to put all your eggs in one basket, and risk it all.

A rule of thumb (from trinity study) is you need a lump sum of 25x yearly expenses to retire and live off investment income. So with 1M you'd have a $40k/y budget. It can be enough (a lot of people in the world live on much less than that), it can be a stretch - depends on your personal situation, lifestyle, location, etc.
> What are the chances of taking $1M and investing so that I don’t have to work anymore?

Not high.

I'm going to guess, based on the fact that you have 8 years in the tech industry, that you are probably in your late 20s or early 30s. Given modern life expectancy, that means you could be alive for at least 60 more years.

In order to make 1 million dollars last that long you are going to need to take on significant investment risk. "Normal" investment risk, e.g. from index funds, is not going to grow the money enough -- if you withdraw enough every year to live on, the money will run out. When it runs out, you will probably have been out of the job market for decades, and therefore unemployable.

If you are living on a fixed income, predictability of expenses is key. Home ownership is one way to control your expenses -- get a fixed-rate mortgage and your monthly cost of living will be fairly predictable. Property tax and utility costs might fluctuate, but in most places the mortgage will be the largest cost, and you can lock that in at a known monthly amount. However, you just sold your house. If you are planning to rent, you won't have the predictability that you need in order to plan for future expenses. If you are planning to buy again, that $1 million is going to shrink by the amount that you pay for your next home.

You probably can't retire on $1 million. But you can take some time off, like a sabbatical. If you aren't happy in your work, you can look for another job, and having that money will let you coast for a while until you find it.

Just FYI that investment is quite dated. Modern advice is to invest heavily in stocks--even as much as 90% stocks, 10% bonds--then withdraw no more than 4% of the original balance, corrected for inflation, per year. Historical back-testing as well as stochastic modeling shows that in this way you can expect funds to remain indefinitely.

(The details are a bit more complicated, and you might want to choose a smaller percentage like 3.5% or 3% if you are retiring at a younger age.)

The definition of indefinitely in the trinity study which you seem to refer to is 30 years.
No the trinity study (and its follow-ups) only run simulations for 30 years, but they did not say that the funds would run out in 30 years. To be precise: the success criteria was that the portfolio survived for 30 years, but the actual outcome was that most portfolios had more than the original principal at the 30-year mark. Which would imply indefinite survival.
1M$ is not enough to up and quit. But it is enough to quit your job to do a job you actually enjoy and supplement that income with dividends.

Dividend + buyback yield is around 4% on s&p 500. So you could reasonably safely take out 4% / year (assuming you dividend reinvest).

Spending is the real issue. If you can get your spending down you could actually pull it off.

I'd recommend buying rental properties in areas with low housing costs relative to rent.

There are parts of Florida where 3 bedroom existing homes (i.e. not new) are $100,000, but monthly rent for that same house is $1,000+ per month.

Based on discounted cash flow, you can determine the value of any revenue stream. In some parts of the country, you'll find homes are undervalued compared to rents.

Stocks are good, but they're not good for steady withdrawals. For example, during a bear market your withdrawals are very costly.

To retire, you need predictable income streams, and rental property is one of the best.

Plus, it's easy for a regular person to leverage money for real estate. For example, with $1 million, you can buy $3 million worth of property with 33% down -- not counting transaction fees, though).

33% down should give you immediate profits from most of your properties.

$3 million could get you as many as 30 condos/homes in the right areas.

If monthly profit on each of those 30 condos/homes can average $200 per month, that's $6,000 per month right there.

You might still want to continue working for a few years to give you capital to deal with hiccups and allow some time for those mortgages to pay down further.

In a nutshell, rental property is one of the faster ways to generate income without working.

The other, simpler way is to move to a country like the Philippines.

One of the biggest lessons of 2020 is that rental income is not as reliable as people thought it was.

During the pandemic, many renters were allowed to stop paying rent and landlords had no legal recourse. Several states have created new rent control laws in the past few years, too.

Managing 30 properties - hell, keeping 30 properties occupied - is a nightmare. Unless they’re extremely homogenous, even a property management firm will hesitate to touch that.
> $3 million could get you as many as 30 condos/homes in the right areas. > If monthly profit on each of those 30 condos/homes can average $200 per month, that's $6,000 per month right there.

With $3m invested in a FIRE-recommended portfolio you can withdraw $10k/mo indefinitely without any work at all. I don't think this is as good an opportunity as you are presenting.

> If monthly profit on each of those 30 condos/homes can average $200 per month, that's $6,000 per month right there.

I assume your calculations include a full-on property manager? I have a single unit (wife's pre-marriage condo we held onto) and even that is a minor job sometimes at the most inconvenient times possible. A kitchen sink doesn't care that it's 10pm on a Sunday night before a huge early Monday presentation. It's gotta be fixed now.

30 units would be full-on full time 40hr/week job while also hiring a part time assistant for larger jobs. If you have 30 units, I guarantee that 3 major things will break simultaneously during a holiday weekend - it's just the way the business goes.

33% down here won't get you into profitable territory with a property manager taking their cut. Certainly there are areas of the country where this is very possible, and if you put a little effort up-front you can make it a quite sustainable business - especially if you can get to the point you can hire a full time (cheap) property manager/handyman and you simply run the books.

Just want to reiterate to those reading this that what is described is essentially a second career. Certainly not passive income in any sense of the term. You would be trading your tech career in for that of a landlord which indeed is actual non-trivial amounts of labor.

That doesn't even get into risk. I'm renting in a city with evictions paused but no mortgage relief to be seen for my profile. I'm fine, but if had been just starting out in my landlording adventure I might be close to bankruptcy. Can you survive a year or two with 50% or less income? This can and will happen in the form of either vacancies/non-pay, or major unexpected structural repairs.

I'm actually considering picking up a few more units in the neighborhood simply to have a diverse income stream for when I do decide to step back some and "retire" to an easier/part time job in my chosen field. But, I do this knowing I'm also lining up "things to keep me busy" at the same time.

I took a break and over 18 months I cycled 30,000 km (20,000 miles) in 12 countries. My burn rate was very consistently $1,000/month, even during 5 months in the expensive US. This included airline tickets and replacement bicycles

https://www.cycleblaze.com/profile/nicroets/

The best way to make your money grow over the long term is a diversified equity portfolio of which a low cost index tracking fund should be your first choice.

If you want real value for your retirement savings, you should live abroad: South Asians countries don't have a lot of exports, making their currencies weak.

Nice blogs, thanks for sharing the link.
The market is way overvalued. Hold cash until it corrects.
This. And have in mind that with 0% effective interest, the Fed can't cut it anymore to prop the market up.
Europe has negative rates. It could happen here. They simply recommended that no more monetary policy changes be made and that we instead rely on fiscal stimulus.
Caution.

As the great John Bogle once said, "Nobody knows nothing."*

* For more, see Bogleheads.org

I'd be careful with this one. Nobody really knows.

It may seem overvalued now, but will it still be considered overvalued if another variable changes, say inflation catches up with the monetary policy actions.

I think you could use only a fraction of that money to setup a homestead and live off the grid. You would have to plan it properly: (e.g. rain fall, solar hours, land area, soil quality, rivers, and so on) and put in more work outside. But where there's a will there's a way. Even without homesteading 1 mil would go a long way if you purchased cheap property and didn't fall into the rent trap.

In my current situation I could do it with less than half of what you have. But I'd personally get bored. Good luck with the retirement.

I retired last year (albeit with a slightly larger nest egg and a more advanced age than OP - from what I gather).

I bought a property with two apartment units in North Carolina, and got a $200k mortgage (paid $500k at purchase time).

My girlfriend and I live in one unit, while the rent from the other unit (3 bedrooms, kitchen and 1.5 baths) covers mortgage, utilities, taxes, insurance and some of our living expenses (about 10 days of groceries, gym membership and one dine-in/takeout meal).

Rest comes from a variety of investments in bonds, ETFs, and REITs - I withdraw about 1.9% a year (general wisdom is that up to 4% is safe) - actually it was closer to 1.2% last year including two fortnight-long vacations, but up to 3% this year due to the early-year market dip.

Based on the given info, here is the advice I have:

0. Debt is a killer. Pay yours off.

1. Live below your means

2. Look up the 4% rule - can you live happily on 4% ($40k) per year? If not, you may need to save some more.

3. Implement a strategy to leverage the 4% rule. I usually try to avoid investment fees and invest directly in exchange traded funds. To learn more about ETF investing, read The Simple Path to Wealth.

4. Try to get a part-time, less stressful job. That way there is more room for error in your calculations. If you employ DRIP investing, your savings compound even effortlessly this way as you don’t withdraw as much.