It’s moving beyond this model a bit as sex work changes to be more mainstream and there becomes a spectrum across which an influencer turns into a sex worker.
The real juice with OF is in transferring the majority of rev share to the creators...unlike other media platforms available.
I think the future will see more content on platforms like OF than YouTube as influencers become brands themselves, don’t need to rely on the platform to bring the viewers, and the content itself is monetized instead of ad supported.
There’s room for shades of OF that are less sex work focused. OF, IMHO, should stick to backing its sex workers. Not trying to make the platform family-friendly. Too much risk in alienating your userbase.
Get popular, get Conservative banker eyes on you, quickly choose to rebrand as an "everything" platform wink wink so your card processing isn't shut down on moral clauses.
14 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 36.1 ms ] threadThe real juice with OF is in transferring the majority of rev share to the creators...unlike other media platforms available.
I think the future will see more content on platforms like OF than YouTube as influencers become brands themselves, don’t need to rely on the platform to bring the viewers, and the content itself is monetized instead of ad supported.
No reason they couldn't just start another brand for mainstream use though.
Get popular, get Conservative banker eyes on you, quickly choose to rebrand as an "everything" platform wink wink so your card processing isn't shut down on moral clauses.
This article provides a decent background https://medium.com/brand-origins/how-did-onlyfans-start-2355...
I’m all about giving people platforms to do what they want, I just don’t want to see it spammed all over the place.