7 comments

[ 3.9 ms ] story [ 22.1 ms ] thread
Title is inaccurate...

The officials said they were not yet sure precisely where in the compound the pornography was discovered or who had been viewing it. Specifically, the officials said they did not know if bin Laden himself had acquired or viewed the materials.

Flagged for sensationalized title that doesn't reflect the content of the article.
it's a quote from the article?
sorry jayniz, but: Bin Laden's porn collection: "Fairly extensive" != "The pornography recovered in bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, consists of modern, electronically recorded video and is fairly extensive"
It's not a quote from the article, nor is it close to being a quote. Here's the third paragraph of the article: "The officials said they were not yet sure precisely where in the compound the pornography was discovered or who had been viewing it. Specifically, the officials said they did not know if bin Laden himself had acquired or viewed the materials." Maybe later they'll find it belonged to bin Laden (or maybe not), but the article is quite clearly not claiming that.
I bet they're looking steganography in the images.
If true, that is hysterical.

Turns out, the taliban (et al.) is just as hypocritical as the republicans. Nothing new under the sun, eh?