Ask HN: How deep you go in reading HN news?
I started following HN I think since 2014. Some time later I registered the account and started visiting the site daily. Over the years I have to admit that it was a great source of information but it also took a lot of time to invest in reading the articles.
In this period and for some time I have been visiting the site twice a day. In the morning and in the evening. Each time I go from page 1 to page 4 (and read more deeply 5 or 6 published "articles"). I open ALL THE LINKS. So I open 120 links in the morning and fast scan all of these. In the evening I open only new links (I think on average about 30 links).
HN level of reading depth: 4 pages Link opening (morning + evening): 120 + 30
I'm curious about your behavior.
17 comments
[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 48.9 ms ] threadHowever, I have noticed that often, comments to links that are not very interesting (for me) begin to follow a different and tortuous path that often makes the comments section unexpectedly interesting even for less interesting topics.
3-5 times a day. On average, I open 10 discussion pages a day, and visit around 3 links.
2) News -> Daily submitted links
I asked for: "news from hackernews" reading habits.
I will be happy to explain more. Sorry for my bad english I'm Italian.
I most spend most of my time on Ask HN and on the new page
Open links immediately with what I believe to be content-rich credible information and perspective relevant to my background and interests, which are many and varied. Source plays a helpful role in determining whether it’s worth an open, but isn’t the sole determinant. Maybe one in thirty.
Read the comments on posts with titles that sound like agitprop, knee-jerkism, marketing or just biased nonsense. Then open the post if
1. it isn’t already objectively trashed and
2. it is impactfully misleading and
3. I may be able to contribute something of substantive value to correct or redirect the post or discussion.
Contribute if I can, otherwise silence is Golden. Getting angry at pixels always seemed silly to me...
More interested in the meta-analysis of why posts are being posted, and the reasoning (or lack of) underlying the post. Where are we in discussion boards like this in the year 2020: posts, audience, moderation, etc.? I cruised ARPANET and punched cards...so where are we in 2020 on HN as compared to USENET, BBSs, GEnie, Compuserve, The Well, mailing lists, blogs, Reddit...
Skip most (but not all) posts on current practice in programming, design, testing, implementation. When I was most active, change control was the brand new concept. I am very old. Open links on legacy systems and ideas.
Skip almost all posts with a living or cultish name in them, unless it is someone who just died and I knew of. Will read a post on Bill Gates’s death, but not anything before...of course hoping that will be a long way in the future. It’s all dust in the wind, folks.
I'll read the comments of say 10-15 items and rarely the story itself.
Score above 75, @news_ycombinator
Score above 300, @ycombinatornews
But then sometimes i get bored and visit here to see other low scoring posts
Sometimes I'll reply with an "index reply"[0] that contains a collection of replies that are relevant to the Ask HN question.
- [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25367011
>> Each time, I scan through pages 1-10 opening any links that seem relevant by their title (~30-60 open tabs).
I then scan through the opened tabs: 1) Closing the ones that are not relevant or are mere updates (~60%) 2) Reading the ones that are super relevant immediately (~20%) 3) Saving the ones that are 'resources' for ongoing or future projects (~20%)
Hardest to keep up with #2. Reading text articles is time consuming: 3 mins / link on average.