This seems like a good way to lose exceptional talent and be stuck with a bunch of mediocre or bad employees who will stick around as an easy way to get a raise.
Any self-respecting high-output employee is going to be offended at the fact that they're paid the same as someone who delivers 1/10 of the work. And yes, money is not the only factor in whether an employer is a good one. But for many it is the biggest factor.
This system is another push towards the ignorant idea that all people are the same. We're not all the same. Some people invest more in their careers. Those people will bring greater value to their employers, and they should be compensated in line with their abilities.
Good luck, though. Let us know in five years if all the virtue signaling actually pays off.
2 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 11.9 ms ] threadAny self-respecting high-output employee is going to be offended at the fact that they're paid the same as someone who delivers 1/10 of the work. And yes, money is not the only factor in whether an employer is a good one. But for many it is the biggest factor.
This system is another push towards the ignorant idea that all people are the same. We're not all the same. Some people invest more in their careers. Those people will bring greater value to their employers, and they should be compensated in line with their abilities.
Good luck, though. Let us know in five years if all the virtue signaling actually pays off.
I assumed a lot of it is stock-based?