What corrupt activities was Trump found guilty of? I think this organization simply likes certain political types and hates others. Lula never got this award though he was charged and found guilty of corruption.
Having 0 knowledge about the man nor the country, I can't comment on the fact that the title is deserved or not, but when I see who's behind OCCRP I can't help think there's an agenda behind:
Being Brazilian, I can attest, he deserved, no matter who is behind. He appointed his own son to be Brazil's consul in US saying "If I can give my son a filet, I'll give him a filet". When he visits countries such as US came along with him several entourages, such as another son, city council of Rio Janeiro for reasons whatsoever to be in the trip, and his bill (hotels, etc) are all paid with public money. And I even started.
It is definitely a weird choice to say that he is the "organized crime person of the year" when the biggest criminal organization in brazil (PCC) was caught in a wiretap last year complaining that Bolsonaro's government was too harsh on them, and alluding to having a great dialogue with former leftist leaders[0].
It is true that his son has been accused of hiring "phantom" employees, but to say it was on Bolsonaro's behalf is pure speculation, in fact there are zero corruption charges against him. I personally find the whole Hunder Biden episode to be a lot more damning than that and I am not ready to say Joe Biden deserves to be held responsible for it.
It is also worth noting there is no "OCCRP" award against Lula, former Brazil's president, who was in fact tried, charged, and imprisioned through a lengthy and fair judicial process - that really makes you question the true motives of this award. Are speculations more important than the due process of the law?
"imprisioned through a lengthy and fair judicial process" - which was conducted by a judge that was Justice Minister for Bolsonaro, and left, accusing him of corruption when trying to take control of federal policy. The judicial process was not take to full extent, and with all this context is mostly likely to all charges be removed against him.
Several judges including the Supreme Court[0] ruled against him. To say that he was in prison because of a single biased judge is pure denial and borderline a conspiracy theory.
> was caught in a wiretap last year complaining that Bolsonaro's government was too harsh on them
Yes, that indeed happened. But, of course, the person responsible for that harshness was already expelled from the government, and it's on the process of undoing all of his modifications.
Moro resigned, in no way was he expelled of the government. Bolsonaro's stance has always been to be harsh on crime, and that's one of the reasons Moro accepted the invite in the first place. The fact that he left due to disagreements with the president does not mean that the government's stance on crime has changed.
I didn't know about the first one. That seems like his power regardless. The last one is a lie. The Ukraine "scandal" seemed completely bogus. I asked for clear examples, not ones he's been acquitted of.
If you think having a power means you cannot use it corruptly, than I see why you've gone so long without recognizing Trump's corruption. It's pretty clear from your responses that your are blinded by partisanship, so I won't argue with you on the point.
Tear gassing protestors blocking public rights of way is not corruption. Ukraine he was acquitted of after being charged as a sitting president. "Attempting to subvert the democratic process" is terminology that doesn't mean anything. The rest is along the same lines... Much of nothing.
I think Bolsonaro is the worst democratic president Brazil ever had. I think he is the dumbest one too and I think he is personally responsible for a large percentage of avoidable Covid deaths in Brazil. I think he is corrupt too. But I think he is not more corrupt than tons of other politicians in Brazil, and also not more corrupt than several other world leaders.
Also, no drug lord considered to an “organized crime” relevance award?
This “award” is just a statement about the opinion of those behind it of which places took a turn for the worst this year. It is a political opinion as important /unimportant as any opinion article written by any of those supporting organizations. It is not a thought out selection with objective criteria. Just a way to influence society opinion. Which is ok btw, just not something worth taken as definite judgement about who was the more influential person in corruption and organized crime in 2020.
Though institutions also got this award in the past, it seems the OCCRP would dare not mention the Chinese Communist Party that is definitely better suited for this year's award. Our chinese overlords (they are buying our country, Brazil) must be happy we and the rest of the world have people like Bolsonaro to blame for all our problems, despite not even once being formally accused, while they silently trample on our future and our dreams.
34 comments
[ 1.8 ms ] story [ 83.7 ms ] threadAn impressive feat.
Sadly,
> “It’s hard to choose. There are so many worthy candidates,” said OCCRP co-founder Paul Radu. “Corruption is a growth industry.”
A truly free people keep no secrets.
None of the members of this list would be known if it weren't for those willing to risk their lives to reveal secrets.
This act must always be held higher than governance.
https://www.occrp.org/en/aboutus/who-supports-our-work
The NED and Open Society are well known tools of regime change.
Which one?
Jesus christ, the HN groupthink on matters like this is so naive - of course there's an agenda, everything and everyone has an agenda.
It is true that his son has been accused of hiring "phantom" employees, but to say it was on Bolsonaro's behalf is pure speculation, in fact there are zero corruption charges against him. I personally find the whole Hunder Biden episode to be a lot more damning than that and I am not ready to say Joe Biden deserves to be held responsible for it.
It is also worth noting there is no "OCCRP" award against Lula, former Brazil's president, who was in fact tried, charged, and imprisioned through a lengthy and fair judicial process - that really makes you question the true motives of this award. Are speculations more important than the due process of the law?
[0] https://veja.abril.com.br/brasil/preso-do-pcc-o-pt-tinha-dia...
https://oglobo.globo.com/brasil/segunda-turma-do-stf-mantem-...
Yes, that indeed happened. But, of course, the person responsible for that harshness was already expelled from the government, and it's on the process of undoing all of his modifications.
Ukraine?
Attempting to subvert the democratic process?
Pardoning people accused of war crimes - without due process?
Pardoning people accused of corruption on his behalf - Manafort, Flynn, Stone.
Continuously spending federal money on his own properties without being subject to any regulation or oversight?
Asking for the arrests of his political rivals etc. etc.
If you say "ahh but where is the conviction" don't be naive - how do you charge a sitting president.
Not in a court.
During the proceedings no one ever actually argued he didn't do it they just aren't going to vote against their own man.
> "Attempting to subvert the democratic process" is terminology that doesn't mean anything
Poor argument.
Also, no drug lord considered to an “organized crime” relevance award?
This “award” is just a statement about the opinion of those behind it of which places took a turn for the worst this year. It is a political opinion as important /unimportant as any opinion article written by any of those supporting organizations. It is not a thought out selection with objective criteria. Just a way to influence society opinion. Which is ok btw, just not something worth taken as definite judgement about who was the more influential person in corruption and organized crime in 2020.