1 comment

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 13.4 ms ] thread
My question for all you smart data-oriented people is: why are we not considering the pandemic all but over? Particularly since the only study on asymptomatic cases has failed to prove transmissibility [0]? I know the results are "not generalizable" because of variable viral load, but you'd think we'd have better science available before implementing such draconian measures.

Related to the posted link: https://twitter.com/MichaelYeadon3

[0] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/11/201130131511.h...