5 comments

[ 77.0 ms ] story [ 631 ms ] thread
I don't think marketing it as "fastest" without any benchmarks is the best idea, I'm betting benchmarks would not verify the claim given this is written in Ruby.

"Easy to use" might be a better description.

I would go as far as saying it's impossible that it's the 'fastest' if it's written in ruby, in pretty much any sense.