> First of all, no matter how good Apple’s ARM core truly is, there is no way in physics that a fanless quad-core Apple M1 is going to outperform an 8-core Intel Core i9.
Well, just two months in, and this claim didn't age well at all.
To provide a bit more nuance to my snark - out of 8-core Intel Core i9's currently sold in laptops, in multi-core Geekbench 5, M1 loses to 9900K by 18%, beats 9980HK by 13% and 9880H by whopping 20%.
In single-core, it is single fastest currently available processor, destroying the aforementioned i9's by 30% to 50%.
To add even more insult to the injury, the only laptop with 9900K you can currently buy in my market is a gaming monstrosity 3.5x more expensive AND 3.5x heavier than M1 MacBook Air.
Yes,the article's own headline itself claims 'M1 is not faster than 98% of PC laptops', then goes out to 'prove' this by comparing it to 'high-end gaming laptops and desktop PCs'.
I mean it's a pretty stupid, broad and useless claim a CPU is 'faster than 98% of PC laptops' considering this can be interpreted in so many ways at least one of them could make sense. But the article is even worse because of it, failing to even find a single sensible interpretation of Apple's claim that disproves it (which isn't hard at all, if you interpret '98% of PC laptops' as '98% of PC laptop models')
"Specifically, Intel is touting that its new i7-11375H — the top-of-the-line model in the H35 lineup, with four cores, eight threads, and a boosted clock speed of up to 5GHz — offers the fastest single-thread performance of any laptop, matched only by Intel's best 45W H-series chip from last year"
So the quote's confusing naive guys like us either which's actually true
16 comments
[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 57.3 ms ] threadWell, just two months in, and this claim didn't age well at all.
In single-core, it is single fastest currently available processor, destroying the aforementioned i9's by 30% to 50%.
No, there is no law that would prevent new SoC to outperform 8-core Intel Core i9.
Personally, when I see stupid argument like that I immediately stop reading. I know it is waste of time.
I mean it's a pretty stupid, broad and useless claim a CPU is 'faster than 98% of PC laptops' considering this can be interpreted in so many ways at least one of them could make sense. But the article is even worse because of it, failing to even find a single sensible interpretation of Apple's claim that disproves it (which isn't hard at all, if you interpret '98% of PC laptops' as '98% of PC laptop models')
So the quote's confusing naive guys like us either which's actually true
[0] https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-intel_core_i7_1137...