Ask HN: What companies are you excited about?

63 points by mholt ↗ HN
I'm bored/disappointed with all the major tech companies, including Google/Alphabet, Apple, Facebook, Intel, Twitter, Zoom, Slack, Amazon, Microsoft, pretty much all the unicorns that come out of Silicon Slopes, and several more.

Innovation largely seems to have stopped. Products and services shut down. Walls put up. Costs inflated. Privacy deflated. Overall lower user experience and satisfaction.

It's pretty discouraging. So tell me, what companies are you excited about and why? Who's actually making a positive difference and changing the world for good these days?

* Non-profits count too.

* Yes there are some exceptions (e.g. Apple's M1 chip; Google's Go language continues to get better) but on the whole these advances seem minor considering the companies' nearly infinite size and resources.

81 comments

[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 164 ms ] thread
As you’re talking about Apple, I find System76’s Linux computers, especially their notebooks [1] and their Ubuntu-based Pop! OS [2] a breeze of fresh air. This hardware/software combination gives me an Apple-like experience while committing to free software. The OS’s UX is very developer friendly as windows can be moved around and tiled using keyboard shortcuts. Then there’s a launcher bar similar to CMD+space on macOS. Pop! OS comes with their own app store (pop shop) which makes discovering and installing more apps dead simple. And the notebook’s build quality and performance is really good.

[1] https://system76.com/laptops

[2] https://pop.system76.com/

(comment deleted)
I really want to like system76 laptops, but I can't help but feel they are literally straight out of a prefab China warehouse, same old crummy quality plastic crap.
Build quality is surprisingly good to my experience (just received a Lemur Pro), as also confirmed by a couple of reviewers of that model.
How is the audio quality on that lemur pro. I have tinnitus and headphones make it worse. So far I have not been able to find a linux laptop with good speakers.
The built-in speakers are the weak point of the hardware config. They are at most of mediocre quality. Maybe they are replaceable with little effort? You could send an email to System76, they have excellent customer support.
I switched from being a long time mac user (macbook pro) to System76 and you'll never get Apple's build quality. I find the build quality disappointing compared to apple, but otherwise decent. Personally I'm happy with the purchase as, performance wise, it's really good and I <3 Linux (but I use Arch not PopOS). Something they really have got right is that everything is just super well supported and compatible. I never have any weird hardware issues.
I'm on Apple M1 and doing Go, both of which were in the original post, but I have to say running Pop! on my trusty old (a decade?) ThinkPad T420 is very nice indeed. Lovely UI coupled with one of the greatest keyboards ever.
I’ve been using Notion as a personal knowledge base for a couple of years now, and I still feel a sense of joy every time I fire it up (countless times a day). It’s simple, yet elegant.

That said, I don’t know anything about the company. I’m excited about the product and where it’s headed.

I on the other hand passionately hate Notion because of the terrible UX.
I am waiting for the time when every "normal" website is so censored and shitty that the average joe is using tor. Then we can create a truly free internet and the cycle starts again. Seems like I have to wait just a few more years.
Doesn't exist yet but something/handbook to consistently create a reliable backend for X amount of usage & customise other aspects of a SaaS without worrying about the stuff under the hood.
Most companies while started on technical innovations, gradually move to “MBA” driven organisations that usually try to secure their revenue, instead of taking risk. In that regard, open source itself is the biggest innovation of the 21st century. And I’m hopeful that open source will move to other technical area of innovation also.
There’s massive innovation in biotech right now. RNA vaccines are winning the COVID battle, based on extremely cool technology (pseudouridine to evade innate immunity, two prolines to lock the spike in prefusion conformation, lipid nanovesicles for delivery,...). RNA drugs are also being developed to treat cancer (by vaccinating against patient-specific neoantigens), MS (by inducing immune tolerance to suppress autoimmunity), etc.

AlphaFold2 appears to have solved the protein structure problem entirely in software, which will lead to breakthroughs in drug design.

Deep learning is being used to augment microscopy leading to amazing advances in resolution.

I could go on. Last year saw the greatest number of new drug approvals in a long time, and VC funding levels were also very healthy.

Biotech is where it’s at.

Anything beyond CRISPR & mRNA to look out for ? Was expecting cures for baldness, artifical tooth and a lot of other things by 2020. Have not heard of a step change but may be i am not aware.
Not sure one should be excited about companies themselves, when I was more of a technophile (which I now certainly am not anymore) I used to be excited (for lack of a better word) about some particular people's concrete actions and deeds, most of them programmers or IT people (because I'm a programmer myself), but I'm sure that viewpoint can be extended to other domains, too.
SiFive [1] "SiFive is the first company to produce a chip that implements the RISC-V ISA"

I think they have a bright future ahead. If there was a way to buy their stock / invest in them, I would.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SiFive

Excited about them too. I preordered their new ITX dev board, but it keeps getting pushed back.

Current date says end of March, so I hope it won’t be much longer than this summer.

Great team there :) They should do a kickstarter for general purpose RISC-V CPU + Board I bet they would raise 200-300 mil.
> Great team there :) They should do a kickstarter for general purpose RISC-V CPU + Board I bet they would raise 200-300 mil.

That's 10x the largest Kickstarter to date, so might be a bit unrealistic, especially considering that what you are proposing isn't an end-user product.

How many boards+chips do you think such a Kickstarter campaign would sell, and at what price point?

I had the same thought re: buying stock. It seems like there is, if you're super rich (accredited investor): https://equityzen.com/company/sifive/

Not much use to normal plebs. The recent changes to the accredited investor definition are nice, but I do wish there was a reasonable way for normal people to get accredited. Especially for a non us person like me, it's not really reasonable to go do the professional exams they require. And ofc I haven't got the money to qualify by wealth. It does seem supremely unfair to cut off the most lucrative investments on the planet to people who aren't already the richest people.on the planet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWTvXbQHwWs is an interview with SiFive's Chris Lattner. RISC-V & SiFive looks like the next step once Moore's Law ends and we need another option to increase perf/watt and perf/$. Creating device-specific chips that drop the unwanted general purpose silicon seems like the way forward.
1) Personal favourite: Collaboration between Fairphone and E-foundation https://e.foundation/fairphone-and-e-expand-the-availability...

2) https://www.radicallyopensecurity.com/ (Non-Profit Computer Security Consultancy)

3) https://tutanota.com/

4) The ActivityPub and Mastodon contributors

5) Matrix (https://matrix.org/)

6) Signal (https://signal.org)

7) https://brave.com

8) Obsidian (https://obsidian.md/)

9) Standard Notes (https://standardnotes.org/)

10) https://Plausible.io

11) https://small-tech.org/

12) https://www.bitsoffreedom.nl/english/

Why: Because these organisations seem to take a moral responsibility on (some of the) things I value, like 'people-first', digital sovereignty, privacy, mitigating the climate crisis.

Also because a non-profit like ROS donates all their profit to NLnet, which in turn supports amazing projects: https://nlnet.nl/project/current.html

Just a quick list but could keep on going for some time :)

> Why: Because these organisations seem to take a moral responsibility on (some of the) things I value

> https://brave.com

Do you trust Brave after they did this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23442027?

> Signal (https://signal.org)

Signal is essentially s closed source walled garden now, because they do not publish their server code anymore.

The question was: "What companies are you excited about?"

I won't argue these organisatoins are perfect. Is that your criterion? I'm excited because I feel they are going in the right direction. That's why I'm using their services. I use Brave, but don't have the time to dive into things they are doing well or doing wrong. That's what we have investigative journalism for. I'm very happy to pay for that. By the way, I also use Signal. I also have a Fairphone. etc etc.

The next step after excitement is of course to convert excitement into action, and to actually support these organisations, through buying their stuff or making donations. Not because they are doing everything well, but because I personally believe they are helping to improve society.

The source to their server seems open source licensed and available: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Server

Wikipedia also says their server is open source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(software)

So where is the source for the latest patch fixing this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25803010 ?
"Open source" does not mean "all patches immediately published."
I'm curious how long you need to wait before you declare it non-open-source.
> I'm curious how long you need to wait before you declare it non-open-source.

I'm not sure there is a practical upper limit. Ghostscript for example for years only released as open source the version prior to the current one, and no one claimed that the existence of a proprietary fork invalidated the status of the open source version, no matter how long the delay between releases.

Admittedly there are differences, in Signal's case the deployed version is not currently released at all, but the worst case would be "open source version is no longer maintained", at which point I suspect that several forks would spring up, causing some confusion until one gained traction and dominance.

Right now, the latest release is 9 months old. This is certainly annoying and even concerning, but not yet cause for outright alarm, which can probably wait until March has gone by with no announced release schedule.

/e/ OS (e-foundation) is great, I love the privacy I get by cutting off Google from my life and still using Android apps. /e/ + FP3+ works great.
SpaceX.

Watching Falcons land is one of the few things that still give me warn and reassuring feeling about the future.

Agreed and also Starlink from SpaceX. We moved about 2 hours outside of a major city center in anticipation of smart cars. Mainly for quality of life. Covid and starlink are making that more accessible to others. Solar development too maybe I haven't kept up with it like I should. Real estate is going through a huge shake up right now. Rural land prices are higher than I have seen in my lifetime.
TBH, I’d rather be excited about specific teams/groups of people regardless of where they work. The trouble these days is filtering out the “influencers” and the marketing image, since we seldom get good insights as to how they work together and what their intent is when building a product or part of a technology stack.

Thoughtful approaches are, IMHO, the best indicator of whether a company is going the right way.

So Cognitect seems like an interesting place, for instance.

https://oxide.computer/ Finally some serious innovation on Server Hardware side
What is the innovation? Their website is devoid of content about what they are building other than a string of buzzwords?

>We are building a new kind of server.

>True rack-scale design, bringing cloud hyperscale innovations around density, efficiency, cost, reliability, manageability, and security to everyone running on-premises compute infrastructure.

The one I just founded!
(comment deleted)
Edge Impulse - embedded (Tiny) ML GitHub-like platform. Just incredible. (https://edgeimpulse.com)

OnlineTown - Well executed spatial chat with a playful videogame interface. I think they've been posted about on here before. (https://theonline.town)

Neosensory (ok, it's a company I co-founded) - we do consumer sensory augmentation. Our first product, Buzz, is a haptic sensory substitution wristband that translates sound to touch in real-time. Also has a developer API. (https://neosensory.com)

DeepMind software into Boston Dynamics hardware = singularity!?
Looking forward to some real world impact of Deepmind in material discovery and biology even more.
Telegram, I've been using this app for >6 years (I think).

The best chatting experience. SO much better that Watsapp

NanoVMs (https://nanovms.com / https://nanos.org), a Linux-compatible unikernel for virtualized environments. You don't need to deploy a whole Linux distro, no binaries but your application, only the libraries that you need. No multi-user, no multi-process, nothing like that - just the unikernel, the required libraries and your application. This improves security (far fewer points of attack), startup time, memory consumption and it may also improve performance a bit.
Thanks for sharing this. Looks promising!
Tesla. Far ahead of the competition in software, electronics and battery technology.
ive had this discussion with a couple of my friends- what exactly are the innovations in those three fields that put them so far ahead? do they make more efficient cells? their cars dont have anything particularly novel as far as i know, just well designed and made, as well as marketed. what is the software that tesla makes that is so good?
Tesla made electric cars cool and desirable (starting in the 2000's when most people associated electric with the prius). They've introduced or improved a lot of tech: better battery chemistry in new form factors, more efficient motors, over the air updates, nationwide fast charging network, increasingly sophisticated self driving features etc. Tesla is exiting because they paved the way for other car companies to electrify their products.
There is so much to tell, I will mention only a few key points for the each field.

Software: self driving capabilities (i.e. autopilot), FSD (Full Self Driving) beta, shadow-mode neural net testing, OTA (Over The Air) updates, games and entertaiment, Autobidder energy trading platform, etc. Battery: tabless design, dry electrode, new 4680 form-factor, nickel instead of cobalt, manufacturing and cost improvements, etc. Electronics: efficient motors and inverters, custom ASIC chip for FSD computer, Dojo supercomputer, etc. Mechanical engineering: "octovalve" thermal management, structural battery pack without modules, "mega casting" aluminium body design, etc.

Edit: forgot to mention supercharger network.

Have a look at companies seeking the "Respects Your Freedom" certification by Free Software Foundation: https://ryf.fsf.org/products.
Why downvotes? I really think this is how we change the world for the better: by giving the users their rights.