Will the US choose Alberta crude or go with job losses and dictator oil? (edmontonjournal.com) 6 points by nec4b 5y ago ↗ HN
[–] nec4b 5y ago ↗ The united association of union plumbers and pipefitters must be really happy now with their decision to support Biden for president. [–] ratsmack 5y ago ↗ Many large unions are like small empires and are self serving.
[–] ratsmack 5y ago ↗ It's kinda funny that the Keystone XL Pipeline has been canceled, but the oil will still reach it's destination at a higher cost on trains and with additional damage to the environment from the locomotive diesel engines. [–] bzbz 5y ago ↗ Strengthening the rail network and increasing the cost of oil? Sounds like the right incentives to me.
[–] bzbz 5y ago ↗ Strengthening the rail network and increasing the cost of oil? Sounds like the right incentives to me.
[–] [dead] stevespang 5y ago ↗ Fact is, US does not need dirty Canadian tar sands to refine - - - The Permian basin is WAY closer source of cleaner oil.The Canadians need our Gulf coast Texas refineries WAY more than we need that dirty oil.
6 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 28.1 ms ] threadThe Canadians need our Gulf coast Texas refineries WAY more than we need that dirty oil.