Ask HN: I had more friends before Facebook. Anyone agree?
The title says it all, but I will explain. Before Facebook, there was Myspace...but to be honest, most of my real friends weren't even on Myspace, or if they were, they weren't constantly updating their status on a daily basis...maybe every couple of days at most I would see something from them. Before Facebook, when I wanted to know what a friend was up to, I had to call them. I could text, but it would take so many texts to have a decent conversation that I would simply prefer to call my friends. I can remember as early as 4 years ago I would talk to many friends on a daily basis for sometimes many hours. Actually talking to my friends would cause us to want to meet up for lunch, or just to hang out. So I would constantly be hanging out and talking to people, I was just way more social to be honest.
If you fast forward to today, in a Facebook-minded society, all of my friends that I used to call on the phone now update their status on a daily basis, and even provide me with pictures which before I could only see on my tiny 2 inch cell phone screen.
I know what all of my friends did yesterday thanks to Facebook. I know what all of my friends are doing today thanks to Facebook. And I know what all of my friends are doing tomorrow, thanks to Facebook. It seems so much more social right? I mean, it is called a social network? Yet, I feel more anti-social than ever! I can still call my friends - but what will I talk about? Hey, saw you went to the movies, how was that? .... I'm sorry, but already knowing the details of everyone's life just makes it impossible for my analytical mind to justify calling them.
I wonder if anyone else agrees? If anyone else has any further thoughts they could add to the discussion? Is it just me...am I the one being anti-social?
16 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 50.6 ms ] threadMost of the time the info presented at these events could be found on the 'Net, likely faster and in more detail.
If information efficiency were the goal then that would be the way to go. But at the better gathering the talks or presentations are just a ruse to trick people into getting away from their homes or cubicles and interact in real-time with actual flesh and blood people. Serendipity takes over from there. That's why the best conferences have short talks and lots of breathing room; you want to prod people into talking to each other.
I can see the same thing with getting all your social info from a Webs site. Sure, Facebook will tell you when someone has seen a movie, but without that real-time, F2F (or even phone )conversation you miss the meandering dialog that bounces around into all sorts of areas you didn't even think to talk about until that moment.
The digital life can end up being awfully clinical. Lots of data, not much information.
Yet, as you've mentioned, small talk leads to many more tangents than what you'd usually get online. And, if you actually eavesdrop on conservations (or even look at your own), they usually start slow with small talk but eventually build up momentum towards deeper issues.Sometimes we just need time to settle in a conservation and those "what's up" starters usually help in that regard.
I really hope our generation figures out how to get out of this quagmire somehow. I fear, however, that just as innocently as we started this project now known and accepted as "social media", we will be too far down the rabbit hole to reverse course, let alone even recognize what we've done to our true relationships with internet communication.
I recently asked What to build into a better social network (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2586836) I'm on a mission to build a bigger, better network.
I'm starting to see that people are longing for a social experience that is truly social. Better algorithms just aren't cutting it. What will?
Make things harder rather than easier.
I mean, I do not want 5-line bot scripts slurping up my associations. I do not want it to be easy for Joe Blow to learn what book I last read or what foods I like. I do not want to be fodder for every Social Media expert.
Having some sort of speed bumps might help filter out the frictionless-friends from the real friends.
Facebook had that initially, to some extent, by requiring a school. Now they're icing the roads.
I don't have a clear idea on this other than a gut feeling that making some things at least slightly troublesome might go a long way to helping evolve real social networks.
Social media "experts" need better ways to spend their time and starting at schools with .edu addresses will help to build concentrated user bases. So, THAT won't be a problem.
Based on feedback, maybe FB's problem is simply that it's no longer theFaceBook. Its not exclusive, hardly worth my time and the structure is vastly overbuilt for what its meant to be: a people directory.
Its harder to make friends as you grow older, and you grow apart from friends over the years, so your net # of friends declines with time. Meanwhile, we're growing up while Facebook becomes more popular. Thus, it's easy to blame FB for a traditional phenomenon related to the passage of time in one's life.
I continue to wrestle with my relationship to such things. You can only have so many actual close friends. There are only so many hours in the day and close friendship requires sustained, on-going interaction to maintain. For this reason, I tend to think "social networks" are doomed to be shallow affairs. Yet, paradoxically, I find that I share a lot more info online than I do with most folks I know in person. I'm not shy there just isn't enough time in the day to explain some things to everyone I meet, so I just don't want to open up some can of worms. Still, I wrestle with this process where I seem to gradually be working on developing an online audience where the relationship is inherently lopsided: Other people often know a great deal more about me than I know about them. But this isn't really what I think of as friendship and I like having friends, which have been a tad scarce of late (remaking your life usually causes you to shed friends).
I don't have answers for you. Just sharing some of my own internal questions, FWIW.
to paraphrase Jerry Seinfeld (badly) you get to a certain age and don't take on any new friends. that's it you're full
I find Twitter is a bit different though, since it is not like putting your whole life up on a page, it can just be short catchups fairly regularly. Maybe it's better in this respect because it doesn't try to take the place of things like phone calls and email in the way Facebook does.