5 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 23.1 ms ] thread
Since Facebook started as just a web site and can still operate unimpeded as a web page on Apple mobile devices, I’m not sure what their case will be here. No one is entitled to simply having an app.

Rather, it seems the Facebook app has become much more valuable to them than their web pages and cross-site Like buttons ever were, allowing them to be invasive and tracking in ways they never should have been able to. Privacy restrictions are long overdue.

This should be entertaining.

Cry more, Zuck.

The Epic suit doesn’t seem to be very successful so far. What’s the likelihood a FB suit would do better?
A snarky, yet sadly a very true, comment would be that Facebook has a lot more money to spend on lobbying.
Is there a class of legal argument named "pot calling kettle" that judges can just apply as a label? I sincerely wish for it for my amusement.