9 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 17.7 ms ] thread
I wonder how many current Google employees would pass this test.
The twitter replies are rather interesting. Regarding tests for "software engineering fitness", one simple test for abstract imagination would be very predictive: ask the candidate to imagine a 3x3 grid with digits, tell the digits row by row and ask to tell the sums column by column. The idea is to test the working memory of the candidate: if it only fits two digits, it won't be enough to make software. Extraordinary candidates would handle a 4x4 grid.
As someone with aphantasia, I strongly object to this test which has nothing to do with coding.
Well, before coding begins, you figure that A calls B, B is related to C and C uses A, but under condition D. My idea is to test this skill of keeping such knowledge graphs in mind.
As someone with a poor working memory for numbers I'd object to this test greatly. Just because I'm bad at math doesn't mean I'm bad at programming.
I feel like everyone's skipping past one of the options, "has >4 years of industry experience" - which is not too high of a bar to pass?
As a requirement for a junior position it seems a bit too high.
Has anyone verified that this is real? Some of it is kind of reasonable, but a lot of it seems so weird that maybe it's a list for a specific position, rather than for a general software engineer. Even then, it seems kind of dumb to require a certain GPA and some of the other requirements seem odd.

Also, it's weird to say that this was created by ex-Google employees. How would they know that? Maybe the person posting it is from HR, but I certainly wouldn't know exactly who created every document/policy at my company. It might have been presented by someone who came from Google, but I would hope this was produced by multiple people. You could probably say that at least one person who came from Google worked on it though.

The key is "at least one". Looks like you can step over everything weird with ">4 years industry experience".