[–] csnover 5y ago ↗ Similar project discussed four days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26012652 [–] molticrystal 5y ago ↗ In the reference section they made mention of that project that was discussed four days ago as one of their sources of inspiration.
[–] molticrystal 5y ago ↗ In the reference section they made mention of that project that was discussed four days ago as one of their sources of inspiration.
[–] emkoemko 5y ago ↗ would a bluray-drive laser be better resolution? or does that work differently [–] anfilt 5y ago ↗ My gut would be yes.Note: be careful the lasers in disc drives can be quite powerful. So protect your eyes. [–] molticrystal 5y ago ↗ One of the Blu-ray models was a hackaday winner a few years back.You can see the log of their efforts and a handful of sub-micron images here: https://hackaday.io/project/9205/logs [–] agumonkey 5y ago ↗ but also means even more precise structure and setup
[–] anfilt 5y ago ↗ My gut would be yes.Note: be careful the lasers in disc drives can be quite powerful. So protect your eyes.
[–] molticrystal 5y ago ↗ One of the Blu-ray models was a hackaday winner a few years back.You can see the log of their efforts and a handful of sub-micron images here: https://hackaday.io/project/9205/logs
[–] aritmo 5y ago ↗ I couldn't find this information. What is the magnification that you get in this way?With those $15 digital microscopes, you get at least 150X.
7 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 21.3 ms ] threadNote: be careful the lasers in disc drives can be quite powerful. So protect your eyes.
You can see the log of their efforts and a handful of sub-micron images here: https://hackaday.io/project/9205/logs
With those $15 digital microscopes, you get at least 150X.