I wonder what his advice is for people that care about privacy. All indications so far have been: don't worry about it.
In my personal spectrum of concerns, having my machine occasionally violated by a virus is not nearly as disturbing as full multi year search and browsing histories being stored and shared without my permission or online profiles being consolidated into a single identity. I'm not saying that google does all this - but it's a lot more scary than a virus.
You don't need to know what either of those things are to make the (correct) observation that the majority of malware targets the systems on which it'll get the most bang for its buck.
At least currently, that means targeting Windows users - solely because there are so many more of them than Apple users.
Yes, Windows has many more exposed security risks. Mac's have around an 8-9% market reach right now. As Apple's market share raises you'll see more and more viruses targeted at Mac's as we have in the last couple of weeks. Let's see what happens if Apple ever is able to get 25%+ of the market using Mac's.
In 16 years of using Windows with no Anti-Virus software installed, I have never gotten a virus. Maybe Microsoft should do a better job of educating users on what not to click on.
I run a company that does IT Support for businesses. Once a week or so, I'll have a CEO bring in his kids Laptop with a virus and a good number of times it was caused by their kid using some p2p file sharing program and downloading and running cracked versions of software which contained the virus. This is not yet as big of a problem for Apple as the number of software titles in general is much smaller and thus people downloading cracked copies which might contain a virus is going to be smaller.
What about a firewall? Because I have seen Windows machines infected through no fault of their users within your 16-year period (Blaster being the most triumphant example). Admittedly this is probably a minority of malware installs out there, but I think it gives Microsoft a little too much credit and their users not quite enough to suggest that it's 100% caused by them clicking on ILoveYou.jpg.exe.
Agreed. The problem is that the common user has the misconception - perpetuated no doubt by comments like the one by Eric Schmidt - that somehow a Mac (or a Linux) is just a better designed OS that is not vulnerable to malware and viruses. There are plenty of security holes and vulnerabities in the Mac OS as well as Linux - the malware authors just get more bang for the buck targeting Windows users - because of the 90/10 split in the market. In fact, recent reports clearly indicate a huge recent spike in malware and virus attacks on Macs - see this article : http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/The-Mac-malware-pr...
11 comments
[ 2.2 ms ] story [ 41.2 ms ] threadIn my personal spectrum of concerns, having my machine occasionally violated by a virus is not nearly as disturbing as full multi year search and browsing histories being stored and shared without my permission or online profiles being consolidated into a single identity. I'm not saying that google does all this - but it's a lot more scary than a virus.
I read most of these cases were intended to be jokes.
At least currently, that means targeting Windows users - solely because there are so many more of them than Apple users.
The recent mac defender showed how simple it is to social engineer mac users because they think its secure.
If you are worried about security , don't do stupid stuff
In 16 years of using Windows with no Anti-Virus software installed, I have never gotten a virus. Maybe Microsoft should do a better job of educating users on what not to click on.
I run a company that does IT Support for businesses. Once a week or so, I'll have a CEO bring in his kids Laptop with a virus and a good number of times it was caused by their kid using some p2p file sharing program and downloading and running cracked versions of software which contained the virus. This is not yet as big of a problem for Apple as the number of software titles in general is much smaller and thus people downloading cracked copies which might contain a virus is going to be smaller.
Two cents.