It's payback after the UK's Office of Communications revoked China Global Television Network's broadcast licence for not following the UK broadcast rules:
The UK regulator's (Ofcom) move was because GCTN wasn't apolitical. There was a similar run-in with Russia Today[1]. When it comes to news channels, Ofcom's job is to prevent the Foxification of news.
You're ignoring the point. The UK's move is political (the same applies to RT). Obviously they are not going to say it and only state that Ofcom is following the rules.
The Chinese have replied in kind, tit-for-tat is pretty standard procedure.
The BBC has an "editorial line" as well. Obviously it's more subtle and they are mostly neutral enough most of the time but let's not be naive. It's good to have multiple sources and not to trust the BBC blindly. If all we have is the BBC then we never hear the Chinese side of things fully, for example.
> It's the same regulations for everyone. There's no mystery to it.
That's either naive or disingenuous.
CCTV News / CGTN has had a licence for years. Suddenly Ofcom finds that it is in the name of the wrong company and that they cannot transfer it to the correct company because that company ultimately reports to the Chinese Communist Party.
Anyone can make their own conclusions but to me it seems quite obvious that there has been a conscious decision to act against CGTN now.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong but, again, let's not be naive about things.
After years they have decided to very zealously apply the rules and I'm sure that this has nothing to do with the current political climate between the UK and China since Ofcom is independent... There.
Too bad that no discussion is apparently possible on these issues and the reality of politics.
Ofcom received a complaint in Feb 2020[1] which it investigated -- taking a year to reach this conclusion is not 'sudden'.
The request to transfer the licence to another entity didn't supply all the required information for the transfer[2].
Ofcom operates with a bias against meddling[3] -- you've got to try quite hard to get them riled but not complying with broadcasting law is definitiely one way to do it.
On the other hand, you do not get my point. There is always more than following the rules like a computer program does. There is always politics involved, not least when foreign relations are involved, it's very naive not to realise that.
You aren't making any points. You're making baseless claims. If you're going to make a claim about Ofcom's decision making then show something to back your claim.
You shouldn't be puzzled that your baseless claims are challenged. You've provided nothing to back your claim. Your unfounded claims contribute nothing.
> Very sad to see how discussion is becoming impossible
You aren't offering discussion. You're only offering innuendo. You plainly don't understand the regulations Ofcom administers or the process of those regulations.
BBC World News was not really available in China anyway, it was available in certain hotels, but even then it was highly censored. It’s not unusual to have the screen go black suddenly because some “sensitive topics” started airing.
> It follows British media regulator Ofcom revoking state broadcaster China Global Television Network's (CGTN) licence to broadcast in the UK.
> The commercially-funded BBC World News TV channel broadcasts globally in English. In China it is largely restricted and appears only in international hotels and some diplomatic compounds, meaning most Chinese people cannot view it.
21 comments
[ 6.8 ms ] story [ 74.9 ms ] threadhttps://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-55931548
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_UK
The Chinese have replied in kind, tit-for-tat is pretty standard procedure.
The BBC has an "editorial line" as well. Obviously it's more subtle and they are mostly neutral enough most of the time but let's not be naive. It's good to have multiple sources and not to trust the BBC blindly. If all we have is the BBC then we never hear the Chinese side of things fully, for example.
It's the same regulations for everyone. There's no mystery to it.
> Obviously they are not going to say it and only state that Ofcom is following the rules
Can you show that Ofcom hasn't followed the rules?
That's either naive or disingenuous.
CCTV News / CGTN has had a licence for years. Suddenly Ofcom finds that it is in the name of the wrong company and that they cannot transfer it to the correct company because that company ultimately reports to the Chinese Communist Party.
Anyone can make their own conclusions but to me it seems quite obvious that there has been a conscious decision to act against CGTN now.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong but, again, let's not be naive about things.
> Suddenly Ofcom finds
It wasn't sudden at all. CGTN was given plenty of opportunity to maintain its licence. CGTN chose not to.
After years they have decided to very zealously apply the rules and I'm sure that this has nothing to do with the current political climate between the UK and China since Ofcom is independent... There.
Too bad that no discussion is apparently possible on these issues and the reality of politics.
Ofcom received a complaint in Feb 2020[1] which it investigated -- taking a year to reach this conclusion is not 'sudden'.
The request to transfer the licence to another entity didn't supply all the required information for the transfer[2].
Ofcom operates with a bias against meddling[3] -- you've got to try quite hard to get them riled but not complying with broadcasting law is definitiely one way to do it.
[1] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/212884/...
[2] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/media-rele...
[3] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/policies-and-guidelines
On the other hand, you do not get my point. There is always more than following the rules like a computer program does. There is always politics involved, not least when foreign relations are involved, it's very naive not to realise that.
Do you have anything to show? Yes or no?
Very sad to see how discussion is becoming impossible on a forum that aims to promote discussion and open mind. Good day.
You shouldn't be puzzled that your baseless claims are challenged. You've provided nothing to back your claim. Your unfounded claims contribute nothing.
> Very sad to see how discussion is becoming impossible
You aren't offering discussion. You're only offering innuendo. You plainly don't understand the regulations Ofcom administers or the process of those regulations.
> The commercially-funded BBC World News TV channel broadcasts globally in English. In China it is largely restricted and appears only in international hotels and some diplomatic compounds, meaning most Chinese people cannot view it.