Repl.it didn't have “cancel” button for subscriptions
I emailed support and they cancelled it for me, and said:
"We are working on cancelling subscriptions being an automated process the user can do on their own."
Support didn't respond to my question as to why my subscription was not listed in the "Billing" section, but it was presumably for the same reason that there was no "Cancel" button.
According to Crunchbase.com, Repl.it has raised $24.6M. That they didn't have a self-serve cancel functionality (and they had a deceptive "Billing" section that omits actual subscriptions) on their Account page deserves community criticism. Please help spread the word so that they do better.
[EDIT]: Someone, seemingly from repl.it writes:
"Hey there, we upgraded our stripe library version and missed a part in our code the relied on the old behavior. That resulted in our billing info not rendering for about a day. Sorry about that! A deceptive "Billing" section is definitely not our intention."
Someone confirmed that they have indeed fixed this. The purpose was to get them to fix the issue (since support just gave me the run around). They appear to have done so, so this issue is closed for me.
63 comments
[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 55.3 ms ] threadI suspect that major banks/credit card companies don't like this service because it brings in no revenue (at least directly), takes resources to maintain, and arguably encourages some of their customers to engage in fraudulent-adjacent behaviors using virtual card numbers.
I've avoided services like privacy.com because I am weary of giving a third-party access to my credit card for this purpose, so I do wish more banks/credit cards would offer this service directly.
Their extension, "Eno", is available for both Chrome and Firefox.
Having said that. If I can’t find a way to cancel on someone’s site, I will just rotate my card number and be done with it. I’ve never been held liable for those charges in those cases, so I’m not sure what the real answer is here.
In the comments.
Uh, "deliberately omitted" maybe?
Here's the law:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...
(b) A business that makes automatic renewal or continuous service offers shall provide a toll-free telephone number, ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESS, a postal address if the seller directly bills the consumer, or another cost-effective, timely, and easy-to-use mechanism for cancellation that shall be described in the acknowledgment specified in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a).
It clearly says:
(c) In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b), a consumer who accepts an automatic renewal or continuous service offer online shall be allowed to terminate the automatic renewal or continuous service exclusively online, which may include a termination email formatted and provided by the business that a consumer can send to the business without additional information.
An elevated number of chargebacks could do it, for example.
I mean, what the hell, even products that haven't seen such a sum of money on their accounts ever somehow manage to have a self-serve cancel functionality.
(I think also in the EU)
I found the free version of their service to be compelling and have considered a paid subscription. Making cancellation difficult is an immediate red flag for me, though, and I would never pay to subscribe while this is the case.
I hope they do better.
I'd say a vast majority of people (as well as all CC companies) will vehemently disagree with you.
It's shrewd to waste your customer's time and hope they forget?
Wouldn't this energy be better spent making the product better, this way they don't even consider cancelling?
You mentioned two companies that were for a time dealing with the transition from print to digital and the decay of advertising revenue. They were holding on in anyway possible. I wouldn't use them as a model for how to run your own subscription base business.
The NYT is a very, very legacy outfit and it's probably not a good idea to take cues from them.
But I doubt I'd come back if my last experience with a company has been a bad cancellation procedure.
I suspect that it is quite rare though for someone to actually come back.
I'd say the chance is much higher for B2B businesses. Say my Shopify store fails so I cancel my subscription. But I'll likely come back and try my luck again with Shopify on my next idea since I've learned the platform.
I do the same with Leetcode, cancelling my subscription after I'm done prepping then resurrecting it if needed.
I have NEVER come back to ANY service I had to call to cancel.
And still, you don't want to spend your support team's time helping customers cancel their subscriptions.
On top of that, you don't want them complaining that they cannot easily stop the service in online forums nor to their co-workers.
c) In addition to the requirements of subdivision (b), a consumer who accepts an automatic renewal or continuous service offer online shall be allowed to terminate the automatic renewal or continuous service exclusively online, which may include a termination email formatted and provided by the business that a consumer can send to the business without additional information.
Are you saying that you have and will always have the ability for customers to cancel their subscriptions online without contacting customer service? And the only reason OP was not able to do so was because of a temporary technical issue lasting about a day?
I just want to be sure that is clear.
This is what your comment boils down to and why we need regulations in this area. Difficulty in canceling services affects many industries, not just technology.
You use virtual CC, and if it's too painful to unsub, you cancel the CC. They will call you themselves when they notice the $ is not there. And then you can tell them what you think about 'em.
https://cln.sh/wVN7n2+
The right to information on how to cancel is in UK law.