Launch HN: Superpowered (YC W21) – Calendar in your menu bar

85 points by jordandearsley ↗ HN
Hey HN,

I’m Jordan from Superpowered (http://superpowered.me/), here with my co-founders Nikhil, Nick, and Ibrahim. We’re building a calendar app for the Mac menu bar.

A few months ago, we were students from the University of Waterloo. We started YC as a video lecture platform for professors but realized it was a horrible idea. We needed a new problem.

We settled on one we all faced during our remote internships. Our calendars became more important, yet meetings took ten clicks to join and were easy to miss.

So, we built a Mac app to bring the platform we check the most, Google Calendar, into the menu bar. We’ve made common actions, like joining Zoom meetings and checking what’s coming up, a click away.

We’ve only solved a small part of a bigger problem. The SaaS platforms we use for work don't work well together. It shouldn’t take cycling through ten different apps and Chrome tabs to stay on top of everything.

We’re now looking to bring Slack and GitHub into a unified notification inbox in the menu bar. We want to better organize everything you use as we’ve done with Google Calendar.

For those who are curious, it’s built using React + Electron and designed to look as native as possible in the menu bar. Sensitive user data like calendar events don’t pass through our servers.

We’re new to the productivity space and still have a lot to learn, so we’d love to hear your feedback and thoughts.

Thanks in advance! Jordan

Note: We're still early on and are trying to figure out our pricing. We priced it towards the higher end to see if we're delivering enough value to our users.

PS - Yes, we have keyboard shortcuts.

206 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 217 ms ] thread
I tried Superpowered and liked it! Congrats on building a cool product! I see the value in having calendar alerts on your menu bar. I am real bad at remembering meetings and find the default alerts to be annoying or forgettable - I recently got an Apple Watch that has helped a lot with this though. I was a little surprised there was no free version with premium features - in my mind, the main benefit of alerts in my menu bar isn’t enough to pay. I may not be the right user (maybe businesses?). Could you share thoughts around the pricing? Are there other features I may be missing?
I feel similarly.

Great looking product, I'd love to have a free version to glance at in my menu bar...

but for the most part Apple Watch covers my needs.

Glad you like it! With the pricing, we wanted to validate whether or not we were solving a painful enough of a problem. We're still early on and figuring out the best model - we're thinking about pricing tiers for sure. Thanks for the feedback!
> “I just joined a meeting 3 minutes late instead of 5 because of Superpowered, which is a resounding success in my book.”

Not sure if borderline sarcasm.

yup, I would not have that on the site. Or I'd reword it.
Thanks for pointing that out, would have never noticed!
I started using Superpowered yesterday and it is great! (I'm so tired of waiting for Google Calendar to load!)

One feature request: it seems like it's not possible to create new calendar events using the app. I assume this is on the roadmap?

Glad you like it! We don't allow creating new calendar events yet, but it's on our list for sure.
This is neat and will certainly be useful for folks that have loads of meetings everyday.

About your expansion into other areas - The reason the menu bar works is because it is tailor made for one thing now, which is finding the next meeting to join. If you add more options, would that not move the clutter from the browser tabs / apps into the menu bar? Something to think about.

Good luck with the product. I wish you the best.

Great point, it's something we've thought a lot about. The reason we built Superpowered in the first place was because we felt Google Calendar was too cluttered. We took the 20% of it we use 80% of the time, and put it in the menu bar.

We want to take that same philosophy with every other platform. Only show the essential parts you need to do your work.

It's a big challenge, as you can tell we put a lot of thought into design, and we will continue to as the platform expands.

It's a shame that is only for Mac :( Any plans for Windows(/Linux)?
As mentioned in the post, we built this using Electron + React! Which means it can be ported over to those platforms if needed.

At the moment, we're more focused on building a product that our current users (on Mac) love before prematurely expanding to other platforms.

GNOME's defaults do this for you. Can't speak for KDE or Windows
Great product, works well, but can't see the need for this to be a monthly cost. Should be a one time purchase
You're not the first to comment on this! Consumer SaaS is still growing. We'd like to fall into the category of apps like Superhuman, Vimcal, and Fantastical.
Fantastical is, what, $3 a month and has a much better value proposition. You’re effectively outpricing yourselves with $10 a month when there are tools that do the exactly same with a single purchase or even for free.
Consumer SaaS may be growing, but that doesn't mean you are a natural fit. Also, subscription fatigue is growing even faster.
Why was "video lecture platform for professors" a "horrible idea?"

Segment started as a tool for professors, too [1].

https://segment.com/academy/intro/measuring-product-market-f...

Our idea was poorly timed and we lost passion for it. We were focused on making lectures better for the remote school environment. Unfortunately colleges have a hard time justifying a tuition's worth of value for online videos, so it was a tough sell, especially with the end of the pandemic around the corner.
Wow! I love this. Unfortunately $10/month is a bit high for me, imo. Any plans to bring this down?
Another 'cloud default pricing' casualty. I'd buy more than 5x as many services if the default price was $2/month.

Maybe cloud infrastructure is still too expensive?

But using the cloud probably got them here sooner, so I think the tradeoff is complex and not at all unreasonable for an early stage startup. I'm really hoping that they succeed though, and can figure out a business model at a lower subscription cost :)
Thanks! As I mentioned in the note, the pricing is intentional to validate our product. If it helps, we just rolled out a referral program that gives you two free weeks for every friend that signs into the app.
Totally understand, and I really do support you guys in your journey! Maybe consider offering a business (or family) license where you can buy multiple seats for slightly cheaper?
Thanks so much! It's not listen on our landing page yet, but we offer team plans starting at 8/mo.

We also have a referral program where you get two free weeks for every friend you bring to the app if that helps

I'm sorry for being negative, but paying $10 per month for what is essentially a calendar widget is blowing my mind. The fact that this is even in YC and not just a side project is taking what's left of my brain and blowing it into the stratosphere.

> We’ve only solved a small part of a bigger problem. The SaaS platforms we use for work don't work well together. It shouldn’t take cycling through ten different apps and Chrome tabs to stay on top of everything.

Can someone give me an example of this problem? To me this feels so "extra"... Maybe I'm missing something.

No problem at all. Definitely does, it's a broad problem and we're still figuring it out too.

As a dev, I almost always miss my GitHub notifications unless I'm constantly checking the platform in my browser. We want to bring all the platforms we use for work into one native place. Does that make more sense now?

Doesn’t MacOS already have an elaborate notification implementation? Would not integrating with that work?
Many people have the notification center on Do Not Disturb indefinitely. It's noisy and unactionable for a a lot of people, including myself.

We want to integrate deeply into SaaS platforms to provide one-click access to features within those platforms. For example, viewing and resolving comments on a Google Doc. This just isn't possible through Mac's notification center.

How do you prevent your platform from becoming equally noisy and unactionable?
> As a dev, I almost always miss my GitHub notifications

Maybe I'm being dense here, but can't you use email?

> As a dev, I almost always miss my GitHub notifications unless I'm constantly checking the platform in my browser.

But why would anyone be constantly checking GitHub notifications? Isn't that a distraction?

> Can someone give me an example of this problem? To me this feels so "extra"... Maybe I'm missing something.

The business value of missing a notification or meeting can be really high. I feel like businesses would happily pay $10 per user-month to have all their employees on time to a meeting. Or even just closer. I imagine similar logic can be applied to other notifications.

> I feel like businesses would happily pay $10 per user-month to have all their employees on time to a meeting

Maybe I'm being extremely naive, but isn't it already a solved problem with synchronized & shared calendars and notifications?

I don’t think so because the notifications in chrome get buried for me. Email alerts for lost in the deluge of work emails. The Apple Watch helps a lot actually
Then won't notifications from this utility also get buried?
>Then won't notifications from this utility also get buried?

I think the idea is that the upcoming calendar/appointment notification is live and always on the menubar. See example screenshot from their web landing page: https://superpowered.me/static/media/menubar.aaa56b48.png

I'm building a similar calendar notification tool for personal use on Windows so I understand the value of this. Calendar notifications via email and "reminders" on the iPhone are not effective for my workflow and I need something that's always active on my menu bar.

Exactly - calendar notifications are "more important" than my frequent Clubhouse pings and having them in a more visible place is very helpful.
> is live and always on the menubar

I spend my time in fullscreen apps. The menubar is never visible.

I pay for it. It makes my life easier and saves me time.

It's not really hard to make my life $10/month better, and who knows how many people that is true for? I wouldn't overthink it.

Genuinely curious why not pay for fantastical? It has basically the same widget, plus an iPhone and Mac app for a 1/3 of the price? Not to be mean, but this seems like it only got traction because they got accepted to YC on another idea, otherwise would have been lost in the sea of dozens of other much more full featured or free calendar solutions?
It's been a while since I used fantastical but I didn't like it. I don't remember why to be honest.
(comment deleted)
Fantastical has this feature though. It would be overkill, but you could only use it for this feature and it would be half the cost!
I bought fantastical quite a few years ago for something like $10... single payment. Still works. They have offerings for 6.99 cad a month.

How many QoL are you willing to buy? You’re essentially paying $10 for a netflix subscription only it’s a calendar widget in the top menu bar.

For context, Austen Allred is the co-founder and CEO of Lambda School, so efficiency wins are going to be pretty valuable for him.

Also, as a CEO you are constantly thinking in terms of ROI. It doesn't matter how much software costs if it pays for itself several times over. This spills over into personal purchases too.

(BTW, big fan of what Lambda School is doing Austen.)

You forgot to mention they're also a YC company...
The pro-sumer market is massive. It's really not that hard to deliver $10 worth of value to people whose time is very, very expensive.

As far as YC goes, pivoting and working on new ideas really rapidly is downright normal. Sometimes that looks like taking weekend hacks and seeing how far you can get with them (this one being a canonical example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9087819)

ive had friends get into YC without an idea, just two guys looking to start a company
YC funds widgets ? What are the economics of this thing. A thousand developers can copy or open source similar alternatives.
You will laugh, but a year ago I made same service in open source: https://github.com/leits/MeetingBar/
I love Meeting Bar. Use it every day. I really like the applescript feature. A hotkey combo pauses my music, launches zoom or meet, and I'm good to go
Amazing, thank you. I will be using this. They were probably "inspired" :wink by your service
It's just a MVP... version 0.01 of their vision. The fact that they have paying users who use them daily is a very, very good signal - that's a hard thing to do! It's so much easier to add additional features to that group of users later.

I see so many negative comments and can't help but think of this (first comment on DropBox's HN launch): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863

The difference is that DropBox didn't have lots of free and better competitors.
The V in MVP stands for viable. Things that aren’t viable aren’t MVPs they are steps getting to an MVP. Part of the value of testing stuff is to check and see if what I think is an MVP is, actually is. When it clearly isn’t, if I call it an MVP then I’m either insane or a marketing person.

Prototypes are perfectly cool as long as expectations are met. Of course, charging $10 for a prototype doesn’t frequently work

I think what you're paying for is someone to sync your calenders for you.

Similar to ring camera. You're just paying someone to make your cctv camera available to you over thr internet instead of you setting it up yourself.

I personally hate these services but some people would pay $/month for this convince.

It’s the YC model. Throw money at smart upper-class kids in good schools with some ambition. Once in a while, those kids make Dropbox or Airbnb, most of the time they make calendar widgets and leverage the experience to jump the line at some FAANG and start out their careers a decade ahead of their peers. It doesn’t make sense to you and I because it doesn’t make sense. It’s a lottery ticket for the investors. YC just games the system by buying most of the lottery tickets.
I understand Dropbox and Airbnb, but the long-term growth potential was clear to begin with - here, I just don't see it. It's a stupid calendar widget on a subscription.

I understand the potential for future expansion, but wouldn't it make sense for YC to wait until an MVP for said expansion is released before investing in it?

Wow, how is this is a YC company? Isn't this more of a weekend project?
Great question. Right now that's how it looks. We started with Google Calendar as base since the calendar acts as a source of truth throughout the day for remote workers.

Now that we've got the base down (which takes time), we're quickly branching out to include more platforms, to make us less of a widget and more of a platform ourselves.

Let me get this straight. $10 a month of a calendar widget that's only available for a single platform? Plus, these quotes don't really help.

> “No more looking for the Google calendar tab in Chrome.”

Maybe use the native calendar app then? Or make an app shortcut for Google Calendar in Chrome?

> “I just joined a meeting 3 minutes late instead of 5 because of Superpowered, which is a resounding success in my book.”

Ummm. Probably not a good one to include.

I just don't get the $120/yr value in this. On Windows, I have all my calendars synced with the stock calendar app, links to the meetings are automatically pulled into the notes section, and reminders are automatically set for 15 minutes. Whenever I get a notification for my next meeting, I click it, then click the link and I'm in my meeting. For macOS, same thing.

Thanks for the feedback on those quotes! We'll look into changing them.

> Maybe use the native calendar app then? Or make an app shortcut for Google Calendar in Chrome?

I myself used to be an Apple Calendar user. Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work. Plenty of our users are in the same boat and Google Calendar doesn't support native functionality.

You definitely could make a shortcut or find another workaround to replace one of our features, but given how many feature requests we get from users, that wouldn't be enough for a lot of people. We have customers who agree it's worth it for them.

> $10 a month of a calendar widget that's only available for a single platform?

We currently are a calendar widget, but we're now branching out of the calendar space to become a unified notification inbox.

I understand for pricing purposes we're on the higher end, as mentioned in the note, this is intentional to validate we provide enough value.

> I myself used to be an Apple Calendar user. Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work. Plenty of our users are in the same boat and Google Calendar doesn't support native functionality.

I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm using multiple Google Calendar accounts just fine with the built-in Calendar app.

> We currently are a calendar widget, but we're now branching out of the calendar space to become a unified notification inbox.

So basically, a calendar widget and a notification center (which is already a part of the OS)?

> I myself used to be an Apple Calendar user. Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work. Plenty of our users are in the same boat and Google Calendar doesn't support native functionality.

Calendar.app works fine with GCal though (notifications, accepting/cancelling invites, etc.). I still go through the Web UI to create invites and what not (because I want my automatic zoom meeting and decent scheduling tools), but that happens seldomly.

> Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work. Plenty of our users are in the same boat and Google Calendar doesn't support native functionality.

Dog you can sync Google calendar with your built in calendar then run Next Meeting[0] in your menu bar. You can even have a global shortcut to open the meeting link. All my work meetings are in scheduled through Google Calendar and take place in zoom, and all I do is hit Hyper-Z[1] to open the correct meeting link.

[0] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/next-meeting/id1017470484?mt=1... [1] Hyper being Cmd-Opt-Shift-Ctrl which is remapped to one key on my keyboard. You can make it anything you want, obviously. My point is I don't even have to touch my mouse to get into the meeting.

Can you elaborate on mapping a keystroke to opening a meeting link? Outside of google cal + google meet calendar apps don’t typically recognize meeting links as something to promote.
Sure. When we create meetings in Google Calendar (in the desktop browser; never tried anywhere else) we can add a video conferencing link to the invitation. These can either be a Google Meet link, or a Zoom meeting link (through our Zoom integration with Google Calendar). I have linked macOS's Calendar.app with Google Calendar. In Calendar.app this link is still present inside of the calendar event in the LOCATION field[0] although you can't actually see or edit it in there, odd. Then Next Meeting makes a drop down menu in my menubar where the title is the name of my next meeting. Clicking any of the items in the menu opens Calendar where I need to click the Zoom link in the text of the description of the meeting. However if I hit my shortcut key (with or without Next Meeting's menu open) it opens up the meeting link in the browser which then, in JS, does something like

    window.location = `zoommtg://us02web.zoom.us/join?action=join&confno=${meetingIdFromUrl}`
thusly opening my meeting in zoom. I'm guessing that all Next Meeting does is run the command line utility `open` with the contents of the LOCATION field from the ICS file corresponding to the entry. Actually I looked at the version history and since it used to always open them in Chrome that's probably not the case. Also I tried to write an app that would call command line utilities and it was a bear to get the permissions. Possibly impossible.

The only public code[1] I could find for this project by this author is 13 years old and lacks any code to open the meeting links or handle hotkeys of any kind. The github user has a different name than the project author (who has his own empty github profile elsewhere) so

[0] In fact we can see this by using a recursive grep in ~/Library for the name of one of my meetings. This turned up ~/Library/Calendars/<some UUID>.caldav/<some other UUID>.calendar/Events/<Unique identifier in a format I don't recognize><ISO 8601 timestamp>@googlecom-<different ISO 8601 timestamp>.ics

[1] https://github.com/imagine/nextmeeting

For just the tiniest part of a second I held hope that you were Sequoia Capital and you were very cross that this project existed. I see now that you are not. This whole thing is still hilarious.
> I understand for pricing purposes we're on the higher end, as mentioned in the note, this is intentional to validate we provide enough value

What exactly do you mean by "validate we provide enough value"?

As a reference: Creative Cloud Photography Plan Includes Lightroom with 20GB (or more) of cloud storage, Lightroom Classic, and Photoshop. US$ 9.99/mo

Do you think you provide value in the range of Photoshop, Lightroom and 20GB online storage?

If not, please revise your pricing. I would gladly pay $10 for your app once (!). But surely not monthly.

> I myself used to be an Apple Calendar user. Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work.

Why didn’t you just connect your Google calendar to Apple Calendar and keep using Apple Calendar?

> Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work. Plenty of our users are in the same boat and Google Calendar doesn't support native functionality.

My company uses Google for calendar but I still use the native Apple Calendar app on both macOS and iOS. Am I missing something groundbreaking that requires using GCal natively?

> I myself used to be an Apple Calendar user. Eventually I had to switch to Google Calendar for work. Plenty of our users are in the same boat and Google Calendar doesn't support native functionality.

Huh? I’m using the native calendar app all the time since I got my first macbook 7 years ago. I was using google calendar before and it was seamlessly migrated. I am using multiple google accounts and also the icloud account for calendars, never had a problem. It syncs back to google and between different devices, it works with inviting other people and so on.

The only feature that google calendar UI does better is help to find a scheduled time. But I always agree for a time before creating a calendar event, so that’s not something I’d miss. Also, it generates the google meet link, which is again useless since I use zoom or whereby. But even if I wanted that, I’d either have to use the google calendar UI or an app that replicates this feature.

What I nice about the native macos calendar app is that it does natural language parsing, for example, “Meet with X on Monday at 12” will create “Meet with X” event and set the date to the closest Monday, the time to 12:00 and duration to a default 1h. It’s basically like you’re making a note, but it becomes a calendar event.

> Maybe use the native calendar app then? Or make an app shortcut for Google Calendar in Chrome?

Exactly. The built-in Calendar app is adequate for most tasks (definitely adequate for just delivering notifications).

Besides, there are quite a few decent free calendar widgets out there already.

> “I just joined a meeting 3 minutes late instead of 5 because of Superpowered, which is a resounding success in my book.”

Set your calendar to notify you 15 min before the meeting starts. It's a trivial problem to solve without paying $120/yr.

> We priced it towards the higher end to see if we're delivering enough value to our users

Sorry, but you're marketing your app as "luxury" without delivering any luxury.

Being mac-only does not really affect the pricing. Most mac users only use mac, and so for them it wouldn't be worth more if it was also available for PC. HAving said that, the price is ridiculous.
They probably have phones, though. Or tablets. Or smart watches. Or home assistants.

Mac and PC haven’t been the only two platforms in a long time.

Only desktop OS:es have menu bars though.
This sounds like a classic "in front of the steamroller" startup. Apple is likely building a similar capability into MacOS; it's just not yet released. One day, a new MacOS will roll out and the menu bar calendar will be one of 8,000 new features. Your market is gone overnight.

If you are lucky, they will see your genius and acquihire you. If not, this company has a high likelihood of failing or becoming a lifestyle company with a small but valuable user base who cannot live without the few special things your menu bar app does that Apple's built-in feature does not.

All this being said, you can also discover all kinds of things on the journey that take you away from the original idea into areas where a lot of growth can happen. Build things your customers love and you will find success. It's a great idea fundamentally.

Thanks for the feedback! Totally agree. That's why we're trying to branch out of the calendar space as fast as possible. First as a unified notification inbox for SaaS platforms.
This looks really good! I'm a Meeter user so it's a real use case I have already spent time looking for solutions to.

I agree with other commenters though - I'd pay a one-time $10, but $10 per month seems unreasonably high. For perspective Meeter is free, and Spotify is $4 for a family of 4 (in my country).

Maybe it could be part of the bundle at https://setapp.com/ or similar? Or you could have a set-your-own-price monthly sub?

This does not seem helpful to me. Part of the value of opening the calendar is seeing the day plus the week, to recalibrate priorities based on upcoming meetings as well as immediate meetings. I have desktop notifications for immediate upcoming meetings. If I wanted, I could set my calendar to one-day view and only see today's meetings. But I don't do that because I don't want that.
Thanks for your feedback. We've found our customers use Google Calendar in two modes, read mode (80%) and write mode (20%).

What you're mentioning falls into write mode. Gather a ton of context then make a number of changes. This is best done in Google Calendar.

We focus on read mode. 80% of the time I open Google Calendar, it's to check what's next or to get into my next meeting. When that's done 10+ times a day, it adds up.

That's going to be different for different people. Some of our customers who are product managers open Superpowered 30 times a day. For them, it's worth it.

I don't resonate with that dichotomy. What I am describing is not thinking about what new calendar events to add -- it is reading. I want to see the full context of the week in addition to immediate upcoming meetings. For example, as a manager, what else is happening on the team and do I need to be sending emails or slack messages during a meeting? Do I really need something important done tomorrow so I ask someone else to take the upcoming meeting instead of me, or vice versa?
Wow. I have more than 5 meetings a day, I miss meetings, and I still don't see myself installing it, let alone paying for it.

Is it really such a big pain that you need to join a meeting on time? Usually someone messages me asking me to join in case I miss it.

Someone at YC be: Ima give this $120K coz why not.

Thanks for mentioning, it's definitely not for everyone. We've found a set of users who do care enough about this seemingly minor problem.

We also have a much bigger vision for this than a calendar app. The Google Calendar integration we've built is the base for every other platform we plan to bring in, like Slack and GitHub.

Trying to be constructive, but why would it even be a subscription model? Although it looks nice, I would think twice even spending 10$ once for it (mostly due to our currency's value). Also, since it's an Electron based widget, is the memory overhead considerable for just a calendar widget?

Also, how does this YC Launch work? Does not seem related at all with your original idea (not sure if it's a deal-breaker though?)

Thanks for the feedback. We'd like to fall into the category of other consumer SaaS products like Superhuman and Vimcal.

> since it's an Electron based widget, is the memory overhead considerable for just a calendar widget?

Great question. In my menu bar right now, the app's using ~150MB.

> Also, how does this YC Launch work?

Every startup in YC gets one YC Launch where they're featured on the front page for the day. Doesn't matter what idea was applied to YC with, just what the startup's currently working on.

150MB might not seem like much, but it really is a lot.

iStat Menus, which is tracking a lot more data across my system to render its multiple graphs is using ~85MB total.

Bearing in mind that many users are going to have 5 things like this in their menubar, they can't all use this amount.

That's a good point. There's definitely ways to optimize for less memory usage. We've been prioritizing feature development, but plan to focus on this before we start scaling.
This should be a very high priority issue. The more features you'll add, the harder it'll be to perform any heavy optimizations without rewriting major parts.

~150MB is a huge memory footprint for something that just sits in my menubar idle. Not all Macs have >16GBs of RAM (and even if they did, this is pretty wasteful). I'm also concerned about the battery life.

I'm pretty sure you'll eventually reach a point where it's no longer possible to optimize it any more (nonetheless Electron is just a Chrome instance). If you suddenly realize the whole thing would be twice as good if you'd just make a native app instead, it's better to have no features than have to rewrite all of them.

I know this doesn't sound constructive, but why go with Electron in first place? It's a menubar widget which the users are expected to be running all the time. There's a difference between running a simple applet and a whole browser instance.

I don’t think it should be very high priority for them.

They’re a startup, they need to focus on the fastest and most effective way to create value for their users, today. No point optimising the product if the company dies before it starts slowing down.

If they aren't a "good platform citizen" at the beginning, it's unlikely they will be later on. This might be something they're willing to accept as it's unlikely to affect them directly, but in aggregate, every growth-focused startup building is JS today because it's quick, will result in high powered machines being saturated with slow software.

I suspect the effect will be that Apple gets hate for not making fast enough computers with enough battery life, and people reluctantly spend another $1500 on a laptop after 2 years because it's too slow.

My advice to the company would be that their target device is almost certainly the base model MacBook Air with 8GB RAM running Slack, a large Excel spreadsheet, and Chrome with 100 tabs of Gmail and documents, and that if they aren't _lightning_ fast on that now they need to optimise soon, because they'll get slower over time.

On my macbook air M1 it is using close to 600MB. https://i.imgur.com/xRyQQOE.png

Might be somehow inflated by something I don't understand about apple silicon reporting memory usage. But it's concerning none the less. And I forgot to include the main process at 114 MB

No offensive, but using a subscription model because of how your company wants to be categorized is an awful justification to make a product decision at such an early stage. Instead of "we want to be company X, so we build Y", it should be, "the problem is Z, so we build Y to solve it".
I have on average about 3-10 Zoom calls daily and I definitely see the value for this. Right now, I'm literally bouncing between Outlook, opening calendar invite, pressing the link, having Safari launch a new tab, press Allow, and then Zoom opens up.

Curious to know what the longer term plan is. How will this grow past being a calendar widget?

Glad to hear you have the problem!

> How will this grow past being a calendar widget?

With Google Calendar, we took the most important parts, like joining Zoom meetings, and put them front and center. We want to do the same with all the platforms we use for work in one place.

First, I apologize for the following, I mean no harm.

Based on some of the comments about notifications.

This whole thing hits me in the core of an issue I have with people and how they handle technology (especially when it comes to notifications). I can't stress enough how I hate to see people's email inboxes or the screen phones. I don't understand why there is so many pending notifications. When it comes to email, thousands, I'm not bloody kind, thousands of unread emails. When it comes to apps in their phones, hundreds. And don't get me started with group notifications (IMs)... Technology, in my view, supposes to enhance us... but I think people are becoming dumber and lazy.

So... this app makes no sense to me. I wouldn't pay for it but clearly I'm a moron and way off the curve so not the ideal client.

Seems pretty expensive, considering fantastical gives me the same thing for half the price and it works on my phone/iPad too.
Is Superpowered really a wise name choice? If you look at https://superpowered.com/ , you'll see that it's in use by another startup. They're doing something completely different (mobile sound SDKs), but still, it's not like it's a personal blog or niche webshop etc. that you may hope buying at a reasonable price one day.
Super- is just another one of those startup name enhancers like -ly/-fy. Superhuman, Superpowered, Super...
Yep, but in this case the name is exactly the same. (Although I never understood the choice for the original one either. But that's a pretty interesting story of a solo dev guy who really just cared about his product and not growing a business. Despite this, and with the help of a bizdev guy he made an exit.)
Congratulations on launching!

How does this compare to Fantastical? It does the same for me, just puts a giant Zoom icon next to its menubar icon and clicking on it lets me join my next meeting.

Thanks!

We're not interested in becoming a full calendar app. We're planning to branch out to other platforms like Slack and Github to become an all-in-one platform for work.

It looks pretty. It's a shame it's only for MacOS.

The way I'm addressing the problem for this solution is by having an OS-level / window-manager keystroke to open a new Chrome tab with Google Calendar URL. For example, you can accomplish this by adding following lines to your i3wm config:

    bindsym $mod+F1 exec google-chrome "https://www.google.com/calendar/render"
    bindsym $mod+Shift+F1 exec google-chrome --new-window "https://www.google.com/calendar/render"
Execution here is great. High level of polish. The pricing is a little hard to justify, you might want to consider segmenting your plans. 1 meeting per day personal plan, etc? Team features would help justify the price.

Pro tip: for b2b sales, generic productivity enhancing tools are often discovered organically by high-load SME C-suite folks and they’ll decide they want their entire team to have it. If I was in that role then I’d be thrilled not just to save time but to save all the time I spend waiting for my team members to find the link, log in, etc. Maybe you could run the math on how much time is saved and its value.

Thanks! We try to put a lot of focus into design. We're currently thinking on free tiers, team features, etc.

That's a great idea. Our current approach is bottom-up. We found people sharing it with their teams organically so we rolled out team plans to get more people on board. Open to other suggestions if you have experience!

You’re welcome. LinkedIn ads are a simple and relatively low-cost way to target job titles and company size. Banner ads work too but the complexity of operating them is high. You might want some way to capture Windows users’ emails with a dedicated landing page. Oh and consider volume pricing.