The corruption is terrible and I'm glad he was caught and prosecuted but it's weird to me that the topline salary figure is so prominent. He oversaw a $500 million budget and made the equivalent of a Googler with 3 to 6 years experience? Or a Citadel Securities/Jane Street/Hudson River Trading engineer with 0-2 years of experience? That part is hardly salacious.
I fell for the clickbait. I was super excited to read a story about the actor who plays the mascot for the Proctor & Gamble cleaning product having to beg for a raise, because they were paying him only $380k (which I'm pretty sure is below the poverty line in San Francisco).
Instead, "Mr. Clean" is merely the name of a corrupt (allegedly) local politician. How boring.
6 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 23.7 ms ] threadInstead, "Mr. Clean" is merely the name of a corrupt (allegedly) local politician. How boring.