3 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 20.0 ms ] thread
The report itself not only didn't find causation, it did not even find correlation:

"This research does not present even comprehensive descriptive data correlating increased hate speech on social media with increased hate crimes."

"On the other hand, the data from the 2018 regression-model study attempting to examine the effect of social media on bias among its users, specifically focusing on religious bias and racist behavior, did not verify a positive correlation."

"we have found no causal, or even good descriptive correlative data, showing a relationship between video game usage and hate crimes."

"we have found no causal, or even good descriptive correlative data, showing a relationship between hate crimes and chat services."

https://docs.reclaimthenet.org/ntiahatecrimesreport2021.pdf

What in the contrived double-speak? This "story" and all it represents are just gross, far right trolling.
Could you elaborate? Which parts are double-speak? By "trolling", are you trying to say it's not true?