Any lockdown advocates after a month or two of the policy have willfully made the decision that sacrificing the well-being of children is worth protecting the vulnerable.
How do you teach someone to read with a mask on? You'd think the "pro-science" side would understand the deep evolutionary roots and development of social creatures.
You don't just stop this, it's indispensable. And given the evidence so far, absurd that it's treated as dangerous.
It's unconscionable that those least threatened by the virus are abused with such little thought.
1 comment
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 14.7 ms ] threadAny lockdown advocates after a month or two of the policy have willfully made the decision that sacrificing the well-being of children is worth protecting the vulnerable.
How do you teach someone to read with a mask on? You'd think the "pro-science" side would understand the deep evolutionary roots and development of social creatures.
You don't just stop this, it's indispensable. And given the evidence so far, absurd that it's treated as dangerous.
It's unconscionable that those least threatened by the virus are abused with such little thought.