HN Explorer

25 comments

[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 61.5 ms ] thread
jarfil
Isn't this the same principle behind a Tesla valve?
colechristensen
I can see where you're coming from, being on it relying on differential pressures and turbulence to ensure certain flow characteristics... but then again, I wouldn't really say there was any particular unique concept at work here.
[deleted]
(comment deleted)
puddingnomeat
does this flow effect work with the water analogy of electricity?
jojobas
This relies on inertia so probably not.
jcims
Inductance is similar to inertia in the water model of electricity.
jojobas
Yes, but it's not directional. You don't get to make a T-joint of three coils and have the current follow the top bar as it's a straight line.
CyberDildonics
Diodes don't work based on inductance.
jcims
Diodes would be something along the lines of a check valve.
andrewcchen
The circulator[1] is an analogous component in rf, it send the incident power from any port down to the next port, so you can take one port to be the bidirectional connection, and it splits the signal into transmit and receive connections.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circulator

jcims
Just realized if it did this would make a very simple rectifier. I guess you could test it by putting ends of a wire with a galvanometer on it to different parts of an antenna and see if you get a current.
KMag
It would be interesting to see if something like this could improve efficiency in valveless pulse jets. Valveless pulse jets rely on different inertia in two air paths to pull fresh air back in one of the exhaust pipes to refill the combustion chamber.

Valveless pulse jets are loud and inefficient, but they're reliable, tolerant of manufacturing defects, and cheap to produce. Of course, acoustic effects providing the only compression above ambient pressure is going to fundamentally limit combustion pressures and temperatures, and thereby thermodynamic efficiency, but I think valveless pulse jets operate significantly below their Carnot / Brayton efficiencies.

Animats
This seems to be a known technology. Here's a paper: "THREE-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATION OF A VALVELESS PUMP" J. Shin and H.J.Sung", Kaist (2010) [1] It's not quite the same, though. Rather than using turbulence, it uses an impedance mismatch as an obstacle to flow. The idea is to have two impedance mismatches in opposite directions from the pinch point, but at different distances. You get some reflection from each impedance mismatch. So if you choose the right driving frequency, you get the reflections opposing movement in one direction and helping it in the other.

This is a lot like the way some antennas are driven. RF also has impedance mismatches. But not turbulence. (Fortunately, or RF engineering would be really hard.)

[1] flow.kaist.ac.kr/bbs/download2.php?bo_table=pro_domestic&wr_id=93&no=0

andrewflnr
There is still so much science to do with simple systems. Even if fundamental physics gets solved, there will be plenty of new discoveries to make.
max-ibel
Seems related to Tesla valves? Fascinating stuff!
klysm
A liquid rectifier?
[dead] stevespang
Bad title, implying flow of a substance is comparable to electricity
tobmlt
I wonder if this is interesting to look at topologicaly? Flow dynamics picks out the network connectivity/handedness/etc... Maybe I am over thinking it while simultaneously under thinking it. ;)

Paging V. I. Arnold just in case.