This was confusing because the editorialized title has absolutely nothing to do with the article it links to.
That story is about a politician who's father was charged for torturing and raping a 10 year old, but still being hired as an agent for the campaign trail. And somehow that poor choice that was understandably met with severity gets turned into a transgender issue, which just makes everything about this post confusing.
Is it posted here because of Reddit (which isn't mentioned or even hinted at in the article), because of the child rape and torture, because of the ill-advised choice of campaign team members, or because of the transgender aspect?
2 comments
[ 0.28 ms ] story [ 15.5 ms ] threadThat story is about a politician who's father was charged for torturing and raping a 10 year old, but still being hired as an agent for the campaign trail. And somehow that poor choice that was understandably met with severity gets turned into a transgender issue, which just makes everything about this post confusing.
Is it posted here because of Reddit (which isn't mentioned or even hinted at in the article), because of the child rape and torture, because of the ill-advised choice of campaign team members, or because of the transgender aspect?
It then says
"Aimee released a statement in which he denied any knowledge of all this and declared:"
More spectator dross, I gave up before reaching the "Reddit" part, but a quick ctrl-f shows no matches