9 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 30.8 ms ] thread
Justin.tv is not a YouTube clone; it's a site for live video. This article is poorly researched in general.
That's why it's a blog, not a research paper. :-p

But yeah, I'm not upvoting this.

This appears to be a design pattern on a number of blogs. You know how "Top 10" type lists are so popular and easy to do? It appears this pattern is also popular, and even easier to do.

1. Take list someone else researched(successful YC startups).

2. Write first idea that comes to mind for each one(generally something obvious, wrong, and controversial).

3. Hit publish.

You get to capitalize on a number of proven traffic techniques--lists, pingbacks, and controversy--for only a few minutes of work.

Innovative? I don't see a single innovative startup on the list.

For example: Wikis in general might be innovative, but a Wiki-style website builder is not.

Kill this? What's the point?
Freedom of opinion, open debating, non-fundamentalism. While the post is not 100% spot on, it has some valid points.
Usually I err on the side of not killing stuff critical of YC no matter how crappy it is, but this seems so dumb that it can only be a deliberate troll. I could see how someone might mistake Reddit for a Digg clone, but to claim that Justin.TV is a YouTube clone you'd have to be willfully blind.
Usually I err on the side of not killing stuff critical of YC no matter how crappy it is

That sounds like a good policy, and I think you should have stuck to it in this case and erred on the not-killing side.

I mean, I can understand killing obvious deliberate trolling (of the form "YC is gay ha ha ha") but in this case I think it's just not very well researched. Anyone looking at justin.tv's front page briefly (if, say, they were trying to write a blog post that involved looking at two dozen websites) could be forgiven for thinking it's a youtube clone -- the whole lower half of the page is devoted to pre-recorded videos with lengths in minute-second format.

If you're sufficiently cynical, you can take in the most innovative ideas or beautiful designs and see nothing.

Conversely, if you're sufficiently observant, you can stare into the mundane, and find enough of interest to last you a lifetime.