3 comments

[ 1.4 ms ] story [ 21.6 ms ] thread
>We, the undersigned, believe in the necessity of digital autonomy and the powerful role user freedom plays in protecting our fundamental human rights

Just not the right to free speech, the right to keep your (unrelated) job whatever your personal opinions are, and so on.

>In order to realize the promise of everything software freedom makes possible, there must be radical change within the community.

What exactly have these tourists did for the community that compares to what Stallman did for it?

>We believe in a present and a future where all technology empowers – not oppresses – people.

But they're ok with them opressing people, getting them fired, and attaching a person as an internet mob of signatories.

>While these ideas have been popularized in some form by Richard M. Stallman, he does not speak for us.

And who the duck are you, and why should he speak for you? Some random volunteers for FSF here and there, leeching on the legacy that he built and grown for decades?

Slava Rossiya then.
Does this or does this not sound like some anti-Russia FUD to further smear/cancel RMS?