Ask HN: My startup has more annual subscribers than monthly. What to make of it?
I very recently realized that my product has more annual subscriptions than monthly ones. This was very surprising because it goes against everything I've read online. I offer only one tier that gives you access to all features; it costs $X/month or $10*X/year (the typical two-months-free-if-you-pay-annual thing you see everywhere). The split in subscribers between the monthly and annual plans is 44% and 56% respectively and I don't know how to interpret this information.
Does this mean I should simply increase prices? Is it fair to interpret this as the majority of the market saying "I'm happy to pay the highest tier your product offers"? I'm know that HN always suggests increasing prices all the time, but I'm wondering if my situation is an even stronger signal to increase prices.
Does this mean I should offer more than one tier and segment the market with different features for different prices?
My product isn't very niche or anything like that. It's a typical internet/web SaaS, so I believe most advice should be generally applicable.
135 comments
[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 145 ms ] thread1) Ask some of your subscribers why they chose one plan over another
2) Increase prices. It never hurts to find out where the balance of pricing vs conversion lies
3) Create additional tiers. It is hard to imagine any product where all users prioritize the same features the same way.
4) Celebrate. You are achieving something effortlessly that lots of other businesses try very hard to get.
1. you could keep you customers happy by changing nothing.
2. if you have a money-back policy on your annual plan (eg: pay in january, cancel in june, get ~50% back on what you paid) that effectively means that you're giving a discount for an only apparently sure earning. I'd give a look into that.
This may happen more in businesses which figure you may be back someday.
Ultimately though, talk to your users! That's how you'll find out.
Was that statement accidental horrible wording or did you actually mean it ?
If the latter, then you must be one of those many Americans that needs to travel more. The rest of the world are not neanderthals who've never heard of credit cards.
Go to Kenya (Africa) and the only reason you might struggle to pay by credit card is if the merchant has decided to prefer payments via the M-PESA money transfer phone app instead which is what most of the locals use. So you could say a number of non-US countries are even ahead of the US !
But of course I hope your wording was accidental, in which case I apologise for the three paragraphs above. ;-)
It didn't imply that other countries are backwards, or that their people are "neanderthals who've never heard of credit cards."
It's a fact that credit cards simply aren't equally popular in all parts of the world and naturally this is something that must be taken into account.
This includes places that are arguably more advanced than the US. Of which there are many many many many.
I didn't read the OP as necessarily implying technical or cultural superiority; credit cards are big in US and may or may not be big somewhere else, as you point out as well, so I felt the quoted statement is quite plainly factual rather than layered with hidden or interpreted meanings...
You talk, you notice when you go shopping together, etc :)
You make an assumption because of some info at some point in time and think of it as a constant fact. :)
For example, I know my brother had a credit card. Does he still have it? I would have to call him and ask him. :)
To me it seems like some people use the term "credit card" for any bank card, while some actually mean the "credit" part. While "credit" (non-debit) cards don't seem to be THAT popular in the European part of the world, I think that bank cards are pretty much ubiquitous.
Dunno how rare they are, I suspect rare, but I can't find any numbers with a quick search.
I suspect debit-only cards are rare in the US. Outside the US: No clue at all.
For Germany, a German debit card (the "other sort", as you put it) isn’t the same as any other. It doesn’t have Visa or MasterCard co-branding like other countries’ debit cards, nor a 16 digit number, so it can’t be used online. I might also use the term "bank card" for this, because there are actual debit cards with Visa/MC co-branding which are available in Germany, but less common than other types.
It's also common for Germans to use "Kreditkarte" to mean anything with Visa/MC co-branding, which probably spills over into English. This also leads to the hilarious term "echte Kreditkarten" (real credit cards) for cards that actually have a rolling line of credit attached (these are rarely offered).
However, in the UK I recall that people are usually specific about whether they mean a credit card or a debit card.
I have such a card and it is neither a MasterCard or Visa card. It looks like a Credit card with a Chip and magnetic stripe, but it has my IBAN on the front instead of a Credit Card number. These cards are the standard here in germany. If you have a german bank account you get one of these.
You can use it pretty much like a Credit Card and you can even pay contactless with it, but I think you can only do so here in Germany. Though it does not work if you only support credit cards.
Since these cards are standard and free some people do not bother with a credit card.
Here in Canada, many debit/bank cards now have affiliation with Visa or Mastercard (obvious with a logo in corner), and CAN be used as Credit Cards.
But that hasn't been the case historically - debit/bank card would work on bank's ATM and related Interact/Plus systems. But until semi-recently would NOT work if you accidentally hit "Credit" instead of "Debit" on ATM or retailer's POS system, and would NOT work on websites requiring Credit card - completely different paths. And to my knowledge many bank/debit cards in Canada still cannot serve as credit cards - they just don't have that capability/afiliation baked in.
Note - I speak as a semi-observant customer, I have no systems-based knowledge of these things :-)
That's the point GP is making. It's not that people can't use credit cards, just don't have one available at the moment they are ready to pay for your product.
Is there a usage component you might add? Gb stored, social posts per month, etc
Have you reduced the risk for your users to choose annual, eg by emphasizing "cancel anytime"?
Seems like your users expect to use your product for a long time, that's great.
Fastmail, which I’ve used for years, I’m willing to pay two or three years up front.
The new thing I found last week I pay monthly was a disposable card.
Maybe your customers believe your product is useful and they’re not concerned about it failing to work in 6 months and maybe it’s mostly used by businesses which typically think in terms of yearly rather than monthly when it comes to ongoing expenses.
I would NOT recommend changing the 2 months off; you'll annoy your most loyal customers.
Kevin Hale - Startup Pricing 101
https://youtu.be/jwXlo9gy_k4?t=578
>2 months off for paying annual pricing is a very good deal for someone who plans to use you product on the long term.
I too pay for some things on an annual basis (e.g. email). I guess never expected my product to be sticky enough for people to want to go annual straightaway. To be very blunt because I'm anonymous, how do I monetize this stickiness to extract maximum value from future customers?
So I would create a new subscriber role and simply let your new customers pay a bit more.
It is wise to be upfront with existing customers : say you have need for more funds or more investments, relay that to your existing customers, say you are keeping their price (indefinitely if possible) and that new customers going to go into the new tier.
Customers will notice a "large" bill every three months. It's just infrequent enough that they don't remember what it was from 3 months ago. It's just large enough that they really want to check where the hell is all that money going to. Customers will investigate and that can only result in cancellation.
A monthly subscription is designed to be easily approved by a middle manager (and fly under the radar). A yearly subscription is designed for customers who plan ahead or cannot do recurring payments (recurring invoices/approvals is a huge pain to deal with).
Don't. Focus on acquiring more customers instead.
Worked for PayPal, Uber, AirBnB, etc..
Addons/extras/upsells. Find some features that might make the most sense as something that exists outside of your current pricing structure, maybe due to specific fixed costs of some sort that don't make sense to roll into the plan pricing, and offer them a la carte at like $20/mo or something. This would allow you to bump your ARPU a bit.
Another option is services. Not knowing your product, its hard to make any concrete suggestion here, but data migrations and initial account setups are common ones.
Also, you want to have more annual subscribers than monthly. It's almost certainly more profitable. You're essentially giving up 1/6 of revenue in exchange for guaranteed 0% monthly churn. A simple estimate of what your breakeven monthly retention is: 98.5% = (5/6)^(1/12). So if you're losing less than 1.5% of your customers monthly then this would be unprofitable.
In a growth business, raising prices is usually the last thing you want to do to make more money. If pricing is broken, the costs only accumulate until you fix it while if you build value for users (and increase retention), you get returns on that in perpetuity.
Obviously any advice is meaningless without full context but focusing on pricing is usually a sign of a business that can't find any other way to grow. Or that the unit economics were wrong. Unit economics are usually not a problem with SAAS businesses with a $0 marginal cost.
Next - I would not increase prices. I would add value, and increase pricing on that. Add more features, and add another pricing tier that people can find valuable with these new features.
Continue to do that until you have multiple pricing tiers; (if you don't already). Then add value into those tiers and increase cost to reflect that extra value add as needed.
When I ran a dating/social site back in the ancient mists of time, it was $4/month or $20/year.
So, more like seven-months-free-if-you-pay-annual. I felt it was successful at driving people towards the annual subscription. Since the annual subscription was such an obviously "better" deal.
In my case I was actively trying to encourage the network effect. I wanted long term community members, not monthly ones. After all, when paying for a site like that, you're really paying for access to the community.
Is there a value to having your customers around longer-term? Community aspects? Promotional aspects? ("40,000 active subscribers for $PRODUCT_NAME!") For many businesses perhaps the answer is "no" but it's worth considering perhaps.
Additionally I'm in the UK, so this won't apply everywhere. Some (Many?) bank accounts charge a flat fee on top of the currency conversion rate - again a reason to make just one payment a year.
I will decide when money comes out of my bank account, how much I am willing to pay, and whether your product is worth the money.. not you. And I'd rather not spend time and energy doing this monthly.
So good job!
Hard to speculate without comparing churn.
Whatever you do, be careful not to add or modify plans in a way that would lose existing paying customers. As the other saying goes, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. An existing customer is worth a lot more than a prospective customer.
There are lots of changes you could make, but you may want to ask your existing customers first as to why they made the choice they made. Ask them how you can improve their existing service. That will go a long way to inform your future decisions.
If service is something that seems superfluous, temporary, a lark - such as Reface or the myriad AI-repainters etc - most people will do the shortest period of time.
If it's a business / utility tool that people find reliable/useful, most don't want the hassle of constant billing. Two months off is a great incentive for something you KNOW you'll use. And believe it or not, some people want to support scrappy startups with useful tools - I've personally gone through so many useful things that have disappeared, that I'll actively support new ones so I can use them for a long time :)
As to what you should do, again, depends. Are you happy with your income, are your customers satisfied, is your growth what you expect? Don't feel like you have to change anything :).
Also, asking your customers may be a useful way to proceed to0 ;-)
2. You're too cheap and people don't want to do monthly penny pinching. You can do some A/B and experiment with rising prices. Depending on how you execute on this you might end up in a situation where you raise 2-3x for the exact same product without losing customers.
Both can be true at the same time...or none. Knowing your customers is half the battle.
Does anyone else hear patio11's voice in their head shouting "YES"
It just means people are with you for the long term and they like your product.
Your price should be linked to the value you are offering. If you think your value is more than the price people pay today, then increase your price to a value you are comfortable with.
What is your objective ? is it growth ? is it profitability ? is i number of customers ? do you have competitors ? are you selling to b2c or b2b ? I'm not sure we can give you any relevant advice without a lot more information