14 comments

[ 2.2 ms ] story [ 45.9 ms ] thread
This would really benefit from a text-to-speech component. I don't know if a capable one exists yet, but surely it will soon.
I hit the "play" button on the SEQUENCER 5 times hoping it would say the word out-loud for me :)
(comment deleted)
I hoped to find, but did not see, a nonsense-word-to-word-pair function. Like, if it could turn “Frumious” back into “fuming” and “furious”.
What would be a related use of this? How come they funded this?
A surprising amount of work goes into coming up with the nearly-nonsensical names for drugs, and the process often starts with a list of thousands(!) of candidate names which are winnowed down. For example, generic name needs to follow certain rules: the suffix indicates the class of drug (see the giant list here[0]), and there are other constraints about what must (and must not) go in the prefix. Brand names have some regulatory restrictions, but are also optimized for marketing: Viagra, for example, was supposedly named by combining 'vigorous' and 'Niagara [Falls]', which is...connotative of its effects. Something like this could be helpful for noodling around in that space.

[0]: https://druginfo.nlm.nih.gov/drugportal/jsp/drugportal/DrugN...

Interesting but I somehow don't see why Google would spend engineering time on what sounds like less of an engineering problem.
It could be useful for naming all kinds of things.

On the other hand, the rest of the stuff on that page is all fairly random and not particularly tied to Google's core products. It might just be a random side project.

I would love to know how this project came about. Is this the famed 20% time?