14 comments

[ 3.8 ms ] story [ 42.4 ms ] thread
Postmortem: we've discovered omissions in our processes that we've fixed now, and we promise much better service to our future victims.
It still boggles my mind that (at least from what I've read), there was direct remote connectivity into Colonial's infra...Not that this excuses DarkSide at all, I'm sure they must be terrified at the ramifications of what they've caused.
Too much heat from this hack.
(comment deleted)
Hack so successful we split into darkside and darkerside
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/10/us/politics/dark-side-hac...

Anne Neuberger, the deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technologies, said Monday afternoon that the government believed DarkSide was “a criminal actor” but was looking for any ties the group might have to nation-states.

My theory is that any competent nation-state actor is going to foster many criminal actors that they either directly or indirectly control, to use as both conduits and cover for their own operations.

Clearly the Russians scare these guys. I wonder what they're doing to scare them that we aren't.
They are usually russians or former USSR countries, so it is either patriotism or the survivalist idea not to mess with your own security services which don't have much need of international cooperation to find you.
Besides threatening families etc?
I would guess plenty of climate activists would cheer about those hacks.
The net result of pipeline shutdowns is that more fuel moves along rail and trucks. I don't think climate activists want that, unless they are true anarchists (and I suspect many are)
Why wouldn't they want that?
Choice between pollution sometimes leaking into the ground, or pollution sometimes leaking into the ground, but definitely always in the air.
As long as it disrupts the oil industry, since it would increase prices, so it would still be a victory for those activists.