A bit tangential but what is the license of content on Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy? Is it CC ShareAlike like Wikipedia or something else?
I wanted to make a Zim file for SEP, but couldn't find a content dump like that of Wikipedia, and I don't know if scraping the site for content is okay.
from https://plato.stanford.edu/info.html: "crawl each entry for indexing (subject to reasonable network usage constraints), and distribute each entry only as permitted below provided that the purpose of the distribution is non-commercial."
This is an excellent idea -- I'd use it. If you can think of a way to do this, I will implement. Maybe with some hidden MD files that contain tags and automatically hyperlink?
Well, Obsidian already has a graph view. I don't know how it is implemented, but it seems clear to me that the underlying data can be used to build the (simpler) graph discussed here.
Kind of a nitpick, but it appears to break the back button? I saw that it doesn’t support my mobile screen resolution at this time (which is reasonable), so I hit back, but it appeared to forward me back forward to the same page. Pressing the back button twice in quick succession also didn’t work for me.
What's amazing is that Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy still has no information on works by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, perhaps the most influential philosopher of this century. My guess is that they are excluding him because of his non-pure academic background. In due time, he is going to get his recognition...
What a great tool. I've been reading articles of theirs for the past couple of days. Makes it easy to spot outlier topics and less obvious relations (like ‘primary domains’ vs ‘other domains’).
I think it's the first time I'm actually enjoying navigating information in this way. Perhaps it's because the encyclopedia is already very structured (and the nature of the topics).
-
Some here complain about a back button, but I don't know. I haven't tried it yet, and I think I stay for a while.
My back button breaks on GitHub when using Firefox with the standard armory of privacy addons. I thought this was their 'fault' and felt quite frustrated about it. I discovered just now that I don't experience the same issue on a stock Vivaldi. Maybe I shouldn't have jumped to conclusions :)
17 comments
[ 0.19 ms ] story [ 45.8 ms ] threadI wanted to make a Zim file for SEP, but couldn't find a content dump like that of Wikipedia, and I don't know if scraping the site for content is okay.
* depends on your browser, of course.
I kept trying to drag the graph, but ended up selecting a bunch of text, which is a somewhat unpleasant user experience.
I think it's the first time I'm actually enjoying navigating information in this way. Perhaps it's because the encyclopedia is already very structured (and the nature of the topics).
-
Some here complain about a back button, but I don't know. I haven't tried it yet, and I think I stay for a while.
My back button breaks on GitHub when using Firefox with the standard armory of privacy addons. I thought this was their 'fault' and felt quite frustrated about it. I discovered just now that I don't experience the same issue on a stock Vivaldi. Maybe I shouldn't have jumped to conclusions :)
It's fascinating to see it at this scale.