Ask HN: Why are there so many stages during the hiring process nowadays?
I'm currently in two hiring processes, and also had submitted my application to another two.
Last time I interviewed was 6 years ago, and back then, you had at max two interviews: screening and technical.
Now, one of the hiring processes I'm in has 5 meetings, in which actually one of them has 3 embebbed meetings. The other has 6 meetings. The other two I have applied but I haven't received any response are 5 and 7...
So, what's really the point of these long hiring processes? Screen, tech, take home, another tech, culture, manager, CTO, offer....
4 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 23.0 ms ] threadIt was funny because one of the candidates that received an offer actually replied back saying "thanks, but I accepted another offer a month ago". He was in the pipeline for about 4 months...
A colleague of mine has been sharing their hiring experience recently (frontend engineering).
There is the initial screening, often followed by a take home technical test. This take home test is occasionally timed with potential employers asking between 4 and 8 hours of time in one-go to complete the technical task.
Depending on the results from those first two stages, a larger technical interview then follows between 1-2 hours, a second HR interview and sometimes an introduction to all team members you may be working with.
During these stages - despite asking in the beginning - there is no indication of salary or potential benefits such as home-office/part-time. As a result an applicant must jump through all the hoops until receiving the final offer before they can decide to join the company or not.
Personally I find this process quite disrespectful to the applicant and prefer to know expected salary ranges, company attitude to home-office etc. before even applying. Let alone asking for 8 hours of time to complete a technical task.
The result is a huge process