What delicious would be today if Yahoo didn't buy it
We have many similarities to Reddit and HackerNews - except we are focused on people's real identities, and connections between their friends, and the experts in the topics they care about.
We are constantly tinkering with the formula of what makes something interesting - is it because it is controversial and there are many comments about it? Is it because a large number of people posted it too? Or is it enough that one of your friends, who is knowledgable about the topic, posted it? These are the questions that we are exploring and planning on answering by building The Shared Web.
But, there is something even more powerful that we realized as we were developing and using it. The sense of community and common context that is created when people that you know start seeing the same content as you. It makes for better conversations. That social engagement around content translates to discussions in different topics - it’s the evolution of old school forums. It’s a way to make sure that the people you care about see the things that you find interesting so you can discuss them, so you can interpret them, so you can develop closer relationships by having common experiences. That’s what we hope to achieve with TSW, creating stronger, more meaningful connections between people through the content that they enjoy together.
That’s our mission. That’s why we are building The Shared Web.
What do you think are the most interesting heuristics to decide whether content is interesting to you or not?
http://www.thesharedweb.com
We'd love to hear your thoughts, so please try out The Shared Web, tell us what you think help shape our vision.
24 comments
[ 18.0 ms ] story [ 1184 ms ] threadhttp://i.imgur.com/5XHGn.jpg
It'll be interesting to see how it can handle having lots of different groups of people on the system (i.e. you should essentially have a sort of HN for each topic you're interested in).
I'm curious - did you connect your twitter account when you signed up?
similarly, when I go to TSW I have to skip all the stuff that I just read in twitter.
Curious why you think it's half-baked. Would love some feedback on how you think we could make it better!
That and the comments in the post are really bizarrely positive, all from accounts that are either brand new and have exactly one comment to their name... or are old and have exactly one comment to their name. Organic HN comments tend to be either neutral, relating solely to the technical merits of the article; or strongly negative, relating to the technical merits of the article.
In contrast, this post has a cheering section. Suspicious...
That way you get content from the people that you care about but you also get content that the crowd cares about as long as it is in a topic that you follow. You get both the socially relevant content and the top crowdsourced content.
You as a reader of content also get a wider variety of content - and you're encouraged to post as much as you want, and repost lots of content (as that helps us pick out the good content from the bad), and we have various techniques to avoid duplicate posts at the same time. (A Repost counts like an upvote essentially)
In terms of the cheering section, we did mention to friends that we put this up on HackerNews, and to give a shout out if they like the site. Those people in the comments are all real people, who do actually log in daily, and like the site.
We really just wanted to get the word out to the HN community and to get feedback on what works and what doesn't.