Ask HN: Prove Impact by Being Boring?
I am a thoughtful engineer. I measure twice before cutting once. I generally code with lesser bugs because I think through my edge cases. I do boring engineering work.
I have fellow engineers who are fast, but messy. They set things on fire and they put out that fire. They create noise, and yet the company labels(and rewards) them "impactful". I spend non-trivial amount of time to review their code and provide feedback but I don't seem to get that "impact" tag.
People say that being thoughtful and doing boring work is good, but the incentives do not align. How would I go about marketing myself that I am as impactful, if not better, as they are?
6 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 16.7 ms ] threadHonestly I don't think there's a solution other than pointing out when the bugs DONT happen, which is very hard unless you can produce an alternative universe to compare to ppl who don't understand software
Really, a lot of places just put up with your personal desires for excellence as long as you keep saving their bacon. Stop saving their bacon or throw the "balance" off from their point of view, and they won't appreciate you any more.
Sorry, but management tends to suck in this regard. If you find someplace that's different, hang onto it!
A delightful surprise such as something they didn't expect to get done or by a certain date can make your work seem more impactful to clients and management.
However, this is very situational and you risk falling into a trap where they begin expecting too much from you if you purposely do this for everything you do.