Ask HN: Does University Choice Matter?
Hi all, I'm about to go to university in the fall, and I wanted to get all of your opinions on whether specific universities have any benefit.
I'm a high-school graduate with slightly above-average grades who has been accepted to a somewhat good university, but nothing like the Ivies, Berkeley/Stanford, or McGill/UfT. My university has had a couple Prime Ministers, some arch-bishops, 1/2 of a tech CEO, & a beloved children's book character.
But other than that, there is no real "prestige" to the university (but the city/campus are very nice).
I'm thinking of going to a post-graduate degree (medical), so I wanted to hear from all of you. Thanks.
31 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 69.0 ms ] threadI'm a CS student from a very small university myself (so apologies if this doesn't translate well for you), and I know several smart people from very small universities whose contributions to open source software, personal projects, and connections within the startup community and various other factors really pushed them ahead.
So spending time meeting people with similar interests and pursuing meaningful things in university is essential to your experience there.
Have fun in university, and good luck with your studies. We’ll be rooting for you. :)
That's really compelling. Being at a bigger school means more emphasis on the name of the institution rather than what you did there, while with a smaller school, people are more quick to look at your (likely higher in comparison) grades/research/life outside of school.
A better university matters only if you're able to take advantage of what it offers. While the core curriculum is more or less the same for all accredited colleges / universities, a better university gives you access to a larger selection of advanced courses, proportionately more well known instructors, and better labs and facilities. However, the pace of a better university is higher, the hours are much longer, and the competition from fellow students much stiffer than in high school; the transition can be very jarring. Only you know whether you're talented enough and able to put in the hours (the latter can substitute for the former to an extent) to do well enough as an undergrad to make it into a post-graduate program, but understand that the bar is generally pretty high.
There's more to it. A top university gives you a stamp that signals "I was smart enough to get in" for the rest of your career. That matters.
If you take only the people who can pass the interview and do well on the job, the ones from top universities/FAANG get more opportunities to interview in the first place.
It's much easier to be a capable person who is associated with a prestigious institution than to be a capable person who isn't.
Hopefully the graduate degree matters more in my case.
If you really want a more in-depth answer to your question, go to https://academia.stackexchange.com/ and see what practicing academics say; this sort of question has surely been asked and answered many times. (I'd dig up some links for you but, not to be unkind, the very first thing you'd better get used to if you hope to reach graduate school is finding stuff out on your own given some hints.)
//other than that, there is no real "prestige" to the university //
I am not sure what to say. Okay how many Prime Minsters from one university needed to count it as "prestige"? sorry for naïve query.
You can probably call up some department at your school and get actual stats for what schools the pre-meds go to.
The prestige racket is real but it's not everything, it just wants you to think it is. Hope you can get away from the grueling college app process and let the wind blow those clouds off your sunrise a little. There's gonna come a day when you look over at your work colleague or close personal friend and realize you don't know where they went to school and you don't care enough to ask.
I've just finished, thanks. The more I think about it, the more I feel like you're right. All of this worrying about College applications and "presitgious" universities seems like a ploy to make kids more stressed. Ultimately, I'm simply happy at getting in, so worrying about the 5% edge case where the degree matters is pretty futile.
In my personal experience, the professional network you build in college is ultimately what has value to your career long term. This opens up opportunities that otherwise wouldn’t occur. You’re basically paying for a 4 year opportunity to collaborate with folks at a certain level of ability(?) wealth(?) social standing(?). And the degree you earn signals more about your social standing - you belong to that “club” - then specific knowledge or skills you’ve earned.
I think if you didn’t go to college and could swing a gig at Google or another FAANG, you’d have the same kind of credentialing...
1- https://www.nber.org/papers/w7322
Speaking primarily from my experience as a Comp Sci undergrad at Virginia Tech... I had good opportunities from my network on graduation. Which helped me grow my network even further when I got a job. I suspect if I went to MIT or something, that network would be even more substantive.
If you're going to grad school- your second college matters a lot more than your first
Wow, you are putting universities of vastly different calibers in the same bucket. McGill/UofT are pretty much large state schools, not at all in the same ballpark as Berkeley or Stanford.
For tech recruiting in Canada I found that UBC and UofT were pretty good in term of signal to noise ratio. The best one was Polytechnique in Montreal, but it's really small so recruiting season doesn't last a long time.
For med school, I have no clue. I suppose it's about choosing the best program to prepare you for the MCAT, or whatever the exam is in your country.