Ask HN: Why do so many large Tech companies buyback their stock?
What is it specifically about tech companies that causes them to do frequent, large stock buybacks? It seems like tech companies would have more R&D opportunities to invest cash than non-tech companies. Is it just because the profit margins are higher and they have more cash lying around then in other sectors?
Is it because of the employee compensation structure where the majority of employees receive stock and so stock buybacks ensure they can attract/retain talent (by ensuring stock prices go up)? If so why does (for example) Amazon not engage in stock buybacks?
If it was just being done to inflate executive compensation then why is the practice so concentrated in just the tech sector? Why don't other sectors do it more?
[1] https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/q1-2021-sp-500-buybacks-double-their-post-covid-low-companies-repurchased-36-5-more-shares-than-in-q4-2020--301312766.html
12 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 38.2 ms ] threadA secondary reason would be lack of better options to spend the money on (no R&D investment opportunities).
Compared to other sectors, tech is more efficient with its revenue, so it leaves more money behind, which is available to use for buybacks.
Interesting way to put it
Only if you want to sell those shares in the very near future. A little while down the track when the stock price has dropped again, all that spent cash has just been frittered away needlessly, blown away in the wind.
It's also a way to sterilize new issuance to employees, primarily senior management. In a very real sense, it can be a backdoor payment to management. Issue shares to management. Buy shares on the market. Net effect is cash to management.
If buybacks are funded by debt issuance, it's also a way to lever the company. Remember Apple and Carl Icahn? That particular episode looks a lot like greenmail. Apple bought back shares, mainly from Icahn, so that Icahn would go away. The buybacks weren't exclusively from Icahn, so it wasn't technically greenmail.
The counter point is that nearly every one of these incredibly successful businesses is doing this, and they can’t all be incapable.
Money never sets the speed limit for these companies. Some amount of money in the bank is too much even for your grandest of plans. Once you have 10x that, what else do you do.
Stock buybacks destroy the quantity of shares that are bought by the company. E.g., if a company had 1,000 shares outstanding and bought back 100 of them, there's now only 900 shares outstanding. This benefits shareholders (assuming they didn't sell into the buyback) because each share is now a larger holding of the company (1/900 > 1/1000).
This decrease in shares outstanding normally corresponds to a share price increase.
I'd speculate that tech companies do buybacks as a way to keep employee remuneration high (via stock) without necessarily needing to pay them a lot of cash.
Source: https://www.behindthebalancesheet.com/blog-1/amazons-free-ca...
/For most companies, the cost of stock-based compensation is ignored by the street.
Hence the stock based compensation does not appear as a charge against adjusted earnings and it does not appear in the cash flow statement – it’s not a cash item. Clearly this overstates the true profitability and cash generation capacity of the company. The options represent a dilution in shareholders’ interests and many companies, especially in the US, buy back stock to offset this dilution – a real use of shareholder cash. The shares are generally issued at a discount and the buyback is done at market price, usually some years after the option was issued (options generally vest after a period of years). Hence there is often a real cash cost to the company, while shareholders always suffer a diminution of value./
For a taxable investor, a dividend incurs an immediate tax, but a buyback doesn't; if you were going to reinvest the dividend, a buyback is better. If you wouldn't reinvest the dividend, you could sell x% of your shares and some of the proceeds would be return of capital, so assuming long term capital gains, that's also better than a dividend. In tax-advantaged, there's no real difference.
Spending on R&D vs dividend or buyback is a different issue. Tech companies tend to have pretty high profit margins, so maybe they ran out of things they'd like to spend money on... it's not the worst thing to return it to investors rather than horde it or spend it on foolish things.