User-Submitted Feedback: When Does It Matter?
Because I know the "Send feedback" button is there for a reason, I ignored the conflict I was going through and submitted my opinion on principal anyway. Regardless of this fact, I'm _still_ questioning whether or not what I just submitted was worth the time I spent putting it together.
So, I've come to the ever-intelligent members of HN to ask the question, "When does user-submitted feedback matter?" I would like to think that user-submitted feedback is handled democratically, wherein the majority rules and once a specific number of people have weighed in on a specific thing, action is taken.
But, honestly, I can only see user-submitted feedback being handled democratically if the feedback is inherently negative, i.e a bug that completely decimates the user-experience in it's entirety, rather than feedback that is inherently positive, i.e a feature request.
That said, although I ended up submitting my feedback to Google for a feature I think would add positively to the user-experience of Google+, taken what I've said above, I'm almost positive it's a textbook example of grasping at straws.
So, what do you guys and gals think? Does user-submitted feedback matter? If so, when? If not, why not?
2 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 22.6 ms ] threadUnless it's just 'this sucks', people are reading and using your feedback.
I imagine that feedback submitted to an organization like Google is handled more democratically, so in a sense you've cast your 'vote'.