>If a device has not backed up to iCloud for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days, Apple reserves the right to delete any backups associated with that device.
"The truth is... no one in this room has read the terms and conditions. No one in New York has read the terms and conditions. No one in the universe... Even god has not read the terms and conditions"
This, along with the sometimes obscure behaviour of Time Machine is starting to make me think I should not be using Apple's backup solutions.
As great as much of their software is, their backup systems (both iCloud and Time Machine) are way too obscure, with so few controls as to be comical, and very little visibility of what they're doing.
The rare occasions where I've had to fall back and rely on an Apple backup, I've often found that it's not a "complete" backup in the truest sense. It almost feels like a "best estimate" of a backup. I've lost iOS app data in the past between devices (and in fact whole apps on occasion as they are not actually backed up at all - they are redownloaded from the App Store, which is not the same thing).
Can you please elaborate on the “obscure behavior of Time Machine” part?
Time Machine has been by go-to solution for local backups and a life savior in a few occasions. I’ve never had any issues with it, so I’m curious about that.
Time Machine is the only backup software I've ever used where it seems to routinely tell me that my entire backup is corrupted and I need to start again. This has happened on multiple Macs, multiple macOS versions and multiple backup storage devices, for many many years.
It seems that fundamentally, backing up over the network is not reliable. If I'm forced to connect a local drive to my laptop to backup (which is not very convenient) then I'd much rather use something like Carbon Copy Cloner where I can feel a lot more confident that I've got an actual usable backup at the end of the process. Or use something optimised for network backup like BackBlaze (or, my preference, Arq, which admittedly still has its own problems).
I guess what I mean by obscure though is there is very little in the way of UI for Time Machine. There are no easily accessible logs. No simple list of backup versions. Almost no configuration options. I get that it's very much a "black box" backup solution designed to be simple to use for everyone, but the lack of transparency about what it's doing, for me at least, just adds stress as I'm never quite convinced it's working correctly. This would be more forgivable if it was rock solid and reliable but my experience is that it has never been those things.
My most recent issue was with TM's use of APFS snapshots and somewhere between TM and macOS, vast portions of my SSD storage being "tied up" and not released properly back to the OS as free space. This caused all sorts of issues with eg. trying to run VMs and VMWare complaining that there is no space left on the disk.
The overwhelming feeling I get when using iCloud backups and Time Machine is a vague feeling of "uncertainty". Time Machine (for me) is flaky and iCloud backups are not backups in the truest form, in my mind anyway.
My favorite trick to watch is during a Time Machine backup it stops because the (attached) backup drive ran out of space. I thought it was supposed to clear out space as needed. Perhaps not.
It does but if the first attempt fails to clear enough space it’ll stop. You can kind of fix it by excluding some large folders or manually deleting backups.
I’ve seen and experienced a variety of issues over the years, but my distrust of time machine is based on silent failures. I’ve been able to benefit from time machine backups when they were a convenient solution, but when they were really needed, I’ve seen them fail too many times. At one point, I discovered that my time machine backup had been silently failing to backup both photos and music for over a year.
A couple of years later, I helped a colleague piece his data back together after failures in his redundant time machine backups (kept at home and office) that he discovered after wiping/rebuilding his primary computer. One copy was missing the last months of data, despite him having connected the drive and watched it complete the backup just before wiping. The other was missing important folders from the home directory though it was fortunately up-to-date in all other places.
I highly recommend using iMazing for your backups. If you have a Mac it's essentially just doing iTunes backups (which in a lot of ways are better than iCloud backups, especially when using the encrypted backup option). The interface is much better to manage, you can pull data from the backups right from the app, and you can do the backups wirelessly as well.
13 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 33.7 ms ] threadhttps://support.apple.com/guide/icloud/back-up-your-ios-and-...
> iCloud backups are available for 180 days after you disable or stop using iCloud Backup.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204247
>If a device has not backed up to iCloud for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days, Apple reserves the right to delete any backups associated with that device.
https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/icloud/en/term...
"The truth is... no one in this room has read the terms and conditions. No one in New York has read the terms and conditions. No one in the universe... Even god has not read the terms and conditions"
Eddie Izzard [0]
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxbGktGatwA
https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/28/apple_deepl_dutch_tra...
As great as much of their software is, their backup systems (both iCloud and Time Machine) are way too obscure, with so few controls as to be comical, and very little visibility of what they're doing.
The rare occasions where I've had to fall back and rely on an Apple backup, I've often found that it's not a "complete" backup in the truest sense. It almost feels like a "best estimate" of a backup. I've lost iOS app data in the past between devices (and in fact whole apps on occasion as they are not actually backed up at all - they are redownloaded from the App Store, which is not the same thing).
Time Machine has been by go-to solution for local backups and a life savior in a few occasions. I’ve never had any issues with it, so I’m curious about that.
It seems that fundamentally, backing up over the network is not reliable. If I'm forced to connect a local drive to my laptop to backup (which is not very convenient) then I'd much rather use something like Carbon Copy Cloner where I can feel a lot more confident that I've got an actual usable backup at the end of the process. Or use something optimised for network backup like BackBlaze (or, my preference, Arq, which admittedly still has its own problems).
I guess what I mean by obscure though is there is very little in the way of UI for Time Machine. There are no easily accessible logs. No simple list of backup versions. Almost no configuration options. I get that it's very much a "black box" backup solution designed to be simple to use for everyone, but the lack of transparency about what it's doing, for me at least, just adds stress as I'm never quite convinced it's working correctly. This would be more forgivable if it was rock solid and reliable but my experience is that it has never been those things.
My most recent issue was with TM's use of APFS snapshots and somewhere between TM and macOS, vast portions of my SSD storage being "tied up" and not released properly back to the OS as free space. This caused all sorts of issues with eg. trying to run VMs and VMWare complaining that there is no space left on the disk.
The overwhelming feeling I get when using iCloud backups and Time Machine is a vague feeling of "uncertainty". Time Machine (for me) is flaky and iCloud backups are not backups in the truest form, in my mind anyway.
A couple of years later, I helped a colleague piece his data back together after failures in his redundant time machine backups (kept at home and office) that he discovered after wiping/rebuilding his primary computer. One copy was missing the last months of data, despite him having connected the drive and watched it complete the backup just before wiping. The other was missing important folders from the home directory though it was fortunately up-to-date in all other places.