13 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 40.4 ms ] thread
Facebook is the defacto organization standard for many local businesses and communities. For many, denying access essentially cuts them off from even local society.

How many times have you heard?: "We notify people through Facebook.", "Our club uses Facebook to setup meetings", "Like us on Facebook to get the insider deals. "

Banned users in the US should contact their states attorney general to ask for a remedy to the civil rights violation. Facebook does business in every state and encourages businesses and communities to organize using its facilities and there is no alternative for a banned user if businesses and communities have chosen that platform.

What then would the incentive be for users to leave Facebook? The conflict is why social media companies come and go. Most young people don’t even use Facebook anymore, or hardly any
They might not use it much, but they almost all seem to have it? (At least at the college level: I live in a college town and am a part of the local government here. For the record, almost all of the organization people do for politics and notifications people get about government services comes via either Facebook itself or Facebook's other service, Instagram. If someone is banned from Facebook, they are pretty fucked.)
Nah I deleted it a few years ago and I make it a point to say so to every old person I see that brings it up.
I was a heavy Facebook user from the time when you had to have an edu email address to 2014. Have not logged in once in the last 7 years and have never missed it once.
>Most young people don’t even use Facebook anymore

My theory is that they dont use it as a Social Network anymore. That is happening more in Instagram or elsewhere. But they do have a Facebook account for other activities.

If you're going to bad your business on someone else's business, you're in for a bad time.
Wait until I tell about a little thing called "AWS"
>Facebook is the defacto organization standard for many local businesses and communities.

I upvoted you just for saying that on HN. Which is an extremely unpopular and contrarian opinion.

Not entirely sure about civil right part. But the argument is somewhat similar to Apple's App Store so I could used the same argument from both side on it.

Somedays I just feel once you or your company grows big and powerful enough everything you do is somewhat wrong.

Is a radio station obligated to put you on the air and let you say whatever you want? No. And those are publicly owned airwaves. You have a right to free speech. You don't have a right to be heard, nor a right to stand on a billion dollar multinational soapbox. The fact that it's a de facto standard or the biggest megaphone at your disposal has zero bearing on your right to use of it. It's a private platform. Many of us made the decision in 2008 not to create Facebook accounts or to do anything through that company. Your mistake is you thought you understood your role in something, and didn't; thought you had a right to something which turned out to be a very easily revocable privilege. I really hope FB slowly takes their own network apart at the great distress and alarm of every single user who views it as indispensable, specifically so people will be individually and forcefully disabused of the notion that they were part of an actual community. I find it hard to think of anyone I know who relies on Facebook who I wouldn't banhammer from any site I owned.
This is the best feature Facebook has ever released.