8 comments

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 21.4 ms ] thread
Interestingly, PressTV appears to retain control of its Twitter account:

https://twitter.com/PressTV

Did the DoJ choose not to pursue it, or did Twitter's lawyers successfully challenge their warrant (while DNS registrars rolled over)? If that's the case, would Twitter likely be under a gag order about it, as CNN was?

At face value, hijacking/seizing DNS for websites because they spread disinformation is kind of horrifying. Is this precedent less scary than it seems?
yeah if misinformation is so bad they should seize twitter.com and facebook.*
It completely crazy and I'm very surprised it hasn't hit the HN front page yet.

The number of US websites that spread misinformation is near infinite yet i've never heard of them getting seized for that reason.

I wonder if the US agencies pressured a registrar or a registry to gain control over the domains? If it's the registrar then you could pick one outside of US juristriction.

If they went after the registry then it's a much bigger issue, the entire TLD has to be considered problematic.

Edit:

The US claims that the american companies that owned these domains failed to obtain licenses required due to US sanctions.

Why did the takedown notice have text in Arabic when Iranians speak Persian? This is what made me think it was fake, at first.