But most of the company names are not using 'ly' in the adjective / adverb form? I don't get it. Why not use any other modifier ending, like 'ing' or 'ish' or 'vore' like:
Chargish
Bitvore
Spoting
If it's the availability of domains and the CCTLD, why Libya? Wouldn't Liechtenstein be better? It ends in 'li'. Or even better, Switzerland, since you can make so many more words that end in 'ch'?
How about .ch -- doesn't it address points #1 and #2? Anyways, you did a good job answering my question. I guess it's really just the intersection space in the Venn diagram where set #1 is A Good/Memorable Company Name and set #2 is An Available Domain Name. I guess Libya was fortuitous in that way. I think Switzerland might make a better choice, but that's me.
I think it's a little of both - driven by a lack of available good .com/net/org domains and by the increasing popularity of sites like bitly. It's little like how startups are jumping on -ify naming fad.
11 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 29.9 ms ] threadFor example, if your startups name was Twitterly, you would choose Twitterly.com, but obviously it would be taken, so they chose to use Twitter.ly
That's what I believe.
- There's a CCTLD for Libya called 'ly' with domains available.
Chargish Bitvore Spoting
If it's the availability of domains and the CCTLD, why Libya? Wouldn't Liechtenstein be better? It ends in 'li'. Or even better, Switzerland, since you can make so many more words that end in 'ch'?
eatmu.ch cin.ch
Puzzled.
Seems so random to me.
See point #2 - I bet if .ish was a CCTLD they'd do exactly this.
- Libya? Wouldn't Liechtenstein be better? It ends in 'li'.
See point #1. :^) Pardon if it wasn't obvious but both these facts combined for handy 'sniglet' (fake but realistic English word) domain names.