I believe it's pretty intelligent for PayPal to integrate new potential currency exchange models into its continuum/plans. "Hijack" implies something stolen, which seems to me an incendiary overstatement of their actions here.
Judging from the article title, the name of the publication, and the posters new username, they aren't exactly a disinterested party. Shrillness can be expected from True Believers, IME.
There will be bias against PayPal from anyone but PayPal I would argue.
However just sticking with that article, the interest as far as social media and competing technologies is there I believe, and the hacker news people can see through that site's very obvious bias and see the numbers and information presented.
Edited title anyways, I was just reusing from other sites, agreed that could have been submitted better initially, apologies.
6 comments
[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 24.6 ms ] threadI believe it's pretty intelligent for PayPal to integrate new potential currency exchange models into its continuum/plans. "Hijack" implies something stolen, which seems to me an incendiary overstatement of their actions here.
Just a thought.
However just sticking with that article, the interest as far as social media and competing technologies is there I believe, and the hacker news people can see through that site's very obvious bias and see the numbers and information presented.
Edited title anyways, I was just reusing from other sites, agreed that could have been submitted better initially, apologies.