[–] sjg007 4y ago ↗ A great argument for universal basic income. [–] defterGoose 4y ago ↗ Delightfully so, and I'm certain the same one that Thiel himself would make. /s [–] biomcgary 4y ago ↗ Is this sarcasm? Large amounts of capital (for a single person) given by wealthy individuals to select geniuses is the opposite of basic income given by government to all.
[–] defterGoose 4y ago ↗ Delightfully so, and I'm certain the same one that Thiel himself would make. /s
[–] biomcgary 4y ago ↗ Is this sarcasm? Large amounts of capital (for a single person) given by wealthy individuals to select geniuses is the opposite of basic income given by government to all.
[–] avmich 4y ago ↗ > We should radically scale genius grantsJudging by successes of Finland in education, we should radically support least achieving - not most achieving. [–] The_Amp_Walrus 4y ago ↗ Author seems to be encouraging private donors, not governments. Given that, I don't see why we couldn't have both. [–] [dead] Proven 4y ago ↗ What did you personally do in 2020 to support least achieving?
[–] The_Amp_Walrus 4y ago ↗ Author seems to be encouraging private donors, not governments. Given that, I don't see why we couldn't have both.
6 comments
[ 4.0 ms ] story [ 27.4 ms ] threadJudging by successes of Finland in education, we should radically support least achieving - not most achieving.