Not necessarily. It wouldn't be all that difficult to construct a robot which could recognize its own reflection, but I don't think that would count as "self-awareness".
update: Just read another post in this thread which implies somebody's already done that.
This is the second headline in recent days that's made me go "hey, I already knew about this!"
I had a ring-necked parrot who, upon seeing himself in the mirror, would instantly burst into the most beautiful song; with sounds that I'd never heard him make before - not in the presence of humans or other birds.
The second headline (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7541633.stm) - "Dogs Can Catch Humans' Yawns" claiming that dogs are contagious to humans yawns (an indication of perception and empathy) which is something that I've seen in friends' pet dogs and my own cats for years now, and assumed it was just one of those things everyone knew but no one talked about.
Makes one wonder, if these scientists spent a bit more time in "the real world" and less in their books and papers if we couldn't relieve some of our ignorance about the world around us.
The parrot you had might not recognise itself in the mirror, as it might be trying to impress its reflection.
However, I'd really like to see this performed on an African Grey, as the one in the local pet store is surprisingly smart as it actually amuses itself by speaking. This isn't how it sounds; people go up to it and say hello -because- it's a parrot, and it never says anything except when the store owner says hello. Yet when someone goes to walk away it'll say hello or meow (yep it meowed at my girlfriend's mum) at them and they'll turn back to try and talk to it again. They'll give up and it'll say hello/meow again and will keep doing this until it gets bored and moves to a different part of the store.
I'd like to see an explination as to how the african grey seems to have a sense of humour. I've heared all the "it's been trained to" dismissals, yet it does it of its own volition as it's left to roam the store and the owner barely works there. It's not like it gets a treat as I've spent an hour in there and it does it to select people. I just can't figure it out, and I've heared repeatedly that people see a sense of humour in them.
I've heard parrots are one of the smartest animals around. I think it's because being able to talk is complex and means a transcendental difference in terms of abstraction, even for birds.
The article has one very misleading mistake. Four [types] of apes have been able to see themselves in mirrors, not four apes as I watched a video of IIRC eight apes, four male and four female, who used mirrors for self grooming, playing with makeup and a number of other things along with a demonstration of the spot test.
However, I think two were used to show that apes under a certain age couldn't recognise themselves, just like humans under a certain age can't. This was likely to show that apes have an intelligence higher than an 18 month old.
I don't think "self-aware" is the right way to summarize the results of these tests. One thing that this article doesn't say is that the mirror test is geared toward animals with good vision systems, and therefore is, to a large extent, testing spacial reasoning and visual acuity. Birds have great vision systems. It's necessary for flight, and also for picking out specks of food from a distance. A lot of mammals that are quite intelligent have poor vision -- like mustelids, for instance. The mirror test would make little sense for them.
There are other ways to be aware of your self besides through some complex optical phenomenon. For example, an animal might be aware of whether it can fit through that hole, jump up to that ledge, kill that enemy, or stand on that branch without breaking it. It might be aware of whether other creatures are able to see it inside its hideout, or if its cubs are hurt by its bite. "Self" is a rather broad and subtle thing.
Having just completed a course in which this was one of the major topics of discussion I feel I can perhaps help to clear a few things up. Generally we consider the mark test to signify self awareness. What's important in the test is that in order to past the animal must realize that the creature is them. Human's have trouble seeing what a jump this is since it's very easy for us.
The example of robots, while probably more interesting to the members of this board is different in that these robots were instructed how to recognize themselves by humans that know they exist. They didn't have to make the jump of the concept of self by themselves. Unfortunately as is characteristic of softer sciences I really can't make this distinction any harder so take it or leave it.
An the other hand 5 magpies is a pretty pathetic sample size. Even picture perfect results have a 1/32 chance of occurring with random behaviour. I think we can rest assured that the next article on this topic will not include Magpies in its list of previous successes.
15 comments
[ 5.5 ms ] story [ 40.2 ms ] threadAsian elephants studied the night before.
Until then, I'd like to have GW and Hanna Montana studied.
Maybe these are the robots: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMkHYE9-R0A
update: Just read another post in this thread which implies somebody's already done that.
I had a ring-necked parrot who, upon seeing himself in the mirror, would instantly burst into the most beautiful song; with sounds that I'd never heard him make before - not in the presence of humans or other birds.
The second headline (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7541633.stm) - "Dogs Can Catch Humans' Yawns" claiming that dogs are contagious to humans yawns (an indication of perception and empathy) which is something that I've seen in friends' pet dogs and my own cats for years now, and assumed it was just one of those things everyone knew but no one talked about.
Makes one wonder, if these scientists spent a bit more time in "the real world" and less in their books and papers if we couldn't relieve some of our ignorance about the world around us.
However, I'd really like to see this performed on an African Grey, as the one in the local pet store is surprisingly smart as it actually amuses itself by speaking. This isn't how it sounds; people go up to it and say hello -because- it's a parrot, and it never says anything except when the store owner says hello. Yet when someone goes to walk away it'll say hello or meow (yep it meowed at my girlfriend's mum) at them and they'll turn back to try and talk to it again. They'll give up and it'll say hello/meow again and will keep doing this until it gets bored and moves to a different part of the store.
I'd like to see an explination as to how the african grey seems to have a sense of humour. I've heared all the "it's been trained to" dismissals, yet it does it of its own volition as it's left to roam the store and the owner barely works there. It's not like it gets a treat as I've spent an hour in there and it does it to select people. I just can't figure it out, and I've heared repeatedly that people see a sense of humour in them.
But it was intelligent. If the phone rang, it would say "Hello?" in the voice of the person next to the phone, then proceed to "converse" with itself.
However, I think two were used to show that apes under a certain age couldn't recognise themselves, just like humans under a certain age can't. This was likely to show that apes have an intelligence higher than an 18 month old.
There are other ways to be aware of your self besides through some complex optical phenomenon. For example, an animal might be aware of whether it can fit through that hole, jump up to that ledge, kill that enemy, or stand on that branch without breaking it. It might be aware of whether other creatures are able to see it inside its hideout, or if its cubs are hurt by its bite. "Self" is a rather broad and subtle thing.
The example of robots, while probably more interesting to the members of this board is different in that these robots were instructed how to recognize themselves by humans that know they exist. They didn't have to make the jump of the concept of self by themselves. Unfortunately as is characteristic of softer sciences I really can't make this distinction any harder so take it or leave it.
An the other hand 5 magpies is a pretty pathetic sample size. Even picture perfect results have a 1/32 chance of occurring with random behaviour. I think we can rest assured that the next article on this topic will not include Magpies in its list of previous successes.