5 comments

[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 19.7 ms ] thread
You should read the full article, especially if you're a Democrat.

Democratic party leaders and backers are stunningly corrupt - essentially above the law.

It's been reported that KSA gave the Clinton Foundation over $2 billion to date, which dried up when she lost her last run for office. Hmm.

Hacker News is slowly turning into Breitbart. This article said pretty much nothing.
This might be your first interaction on what used to be called News: Reporting facts and letting you come up with your own opinion.
Why is someone who no longer holds public office under scrutiny for things they do after they left? Is it news that former public officials make bank giving speeches?
They are in public office now. So why should their actions not be scrutinized and their motives not be questioned?