H.R.4980 – Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure vaccination for exit/entry (congress.gov) 5 points by danielam 4y ago ↗ HN
[–] mycodesucks 4y ago ↗ What exactly does "..and for other purposes" mean? Seems unnecessary and tyrannical to me. [–] pwg 4y ago ↗ That would be the "pork" provision.That lets them load the bill up with other, unrelated pet projects, and still technically be under the umbrella of the title.
[–] pwg 4y ago ↗ That would be the "pork" provision.That lets them load the bill up with other, unrelated pet projects, and still technically be under the umbrella of the title.
[–] a3n 4y ago ↗ I get the incoming requirement, at least for foreigners.But I think it's a human rights violation to prevent your citizens from leaving and entering the country.I'm in favor of the idea, I just think it's going to have problems.
3 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 20.7 ms ] threadThat lets them load the bill up with other, unrelated pet projects, and still technically be under the umbrella of the title.
But I think it's a human rights violation to prevent your citizens from leaving and entering the country.
I'm in favor of the idea, I just think it's going to have problems.